Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are They Mad!? Have today's conservatives lost touch on foreign policy?
The Texian Online ^ | 8/11/08 | Tony McDonald

Posted on 08/11/2008 9:57:31 PM PDT by tony.mcdonald

Are they Mad!?
Have today's conservatives lost touch on foreign policy?
by: Tony McDonald
**crossposted from www.TexianOnline.com**

Traveling home today I had the radio tuned to the Mark Levin show. (My radio dial rarely deviates from XM’s ‘America Right’ channel – go figure.) Levin puts on what would be considered a pretty edgy, conservative talk show. Of course, the topic of the day was Putin, Russia, and the invasion of the former Soviet Republic of Georgia.

Call after call I listened to armchair saber-rattler Levin banter back and forth with his equally war-hungry callers on the various ways the United States should come to Georgia’s aide. Levin favored shipping arms to the Georgians – various callers suggested more drastic measures such as a “Berlin Air-lift” type event. (I’m not sure what the caller wanted us to air-lift in -- maybe cheap Chinese stuff that Walmart can’t get rid of.)

The same question reentered my mind after each tirade: “Are these people Mad!?”

How – exactly – does the situation in Georgia affect American security interests? To that end, how does it affect American interests? While I’m sure a poll of American’s on their support of a war against a Russian invasion of Georgia would get many American’s excited enough to load up their trucks with deer rifles and head to Atlanta – I doubt that many Americans know of or even care about the Caucus Republic. Even callers to Levin’s show who purported to be incensed by the invasion kept referring to it as an invasion of “two provinces” that captured “some major city.” For gosh’s sake – Russia might capture the capitol of Georgia! – whatever it’s called.

I haven’t heard anyone so foolish as to call for direct military action against the Ruskies … yet. Y’ know theres still that little thing we have going in Iraq. But are these so called ‘conservatives’ really so naïve as to think that air-lifting arms shipments into Georgia isn’t an act of war? Alright, chess-masters, let’s think at least one step ahead here.

Let’s accept the premise that we should provide material aid to the Georgians. It’s next week. We’re flying shipments of M-16s and Missiles into T'bilisi. (That’s the capitol of Georgia, just so you know.) And, for arguments sake, let’s say that these arms shipments were actually accomplishing something. The Georgian army is routing the Russians with their new weapons. Don’t you think the Russians might consider attacking our planes and ships? So now we have dead American servicemen – and the American public is demanding retaliation…

Great! More war! But this time we’re not knocking down backwards middle eastern dictators; we’re facing one of the largest nations on Earth.

These are the scenarios we must consider before we stumble off into this conflict. Is the territorial integrity of Georgia really worth a US war with Russia?

To that end – how would we feel if the shoe was on the other foot? What if the US decided to invade Baja California? Territorially it would be similar to the move by the Russians to support the reunion of North and South Ossetia. (They’re the regions actually being fought over – my poorly informed warmongering friends.) How would we feel if the Russians decided that it was suddenly their business to tell us to get the hell out of Mexico and that if we didn’t, they would start supplying arms to the Mexican army?

Exactly. We’d tell them to take a hike.

That’s the point really. Nations have their spheres of influence. Monroe long ago declared that ours was the Western hemisphere – a pretty big ‘sphere’ if you ask me. If we have the authority to maintain things the way we want them around our country, what business do we have telling Russia what they can or can’t do with or to their neighbors?

Finally, if we’re really that concerned by Putin’s actions – there is a bevy of options available that could never be mistaken for an act of war. We could boot Russian diplomats – heck, we could boot Russians period. Freeze their U.S. assets, default on Russian debts, cut-off all U.S. trade to them… These actions all fall short of war yet pack a mighty punch and send a stark signal.

I know, I know. “Whatever happened to the Reagan idolatry? Isn’t this the second coming of the Evil Empire?”

No. It’s not. Putin may be a megalomaniacal dictator – but he doesn’t have the International Communist Conspiracy at his back. While he may be a real threat to his neighbors, he hardly seems to be plotting the same sort of international takeover that the communists desired. At worst he might threaten European energy supplies though his control of the Caspian oil pipline in Georgia – but again, that’s a problem France and Germany can deal with. Last I recall, they didn’t have troops tied up in our escapade in Iraq.

I hope that cooler heads prevail and the talk-radio saber rattling subsides. We have nothing to gain if the war-agitators convince us to meddle in an affair that doesn’t affect us, and that we can hardly control.


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: caucasus; geopolitics; georgia; putin; russia; southossetia; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2008 9:57:32 PM PDT by tony.mcdonald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tony.mcdonald

Well it is a sad day when the president of France has more
honor and integrity than some Americans.


2 posted on 08/11/2008 9:59:11 PM PDT by MarMema (Tavisuplebas dideba!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tony.mcdonald

“Nations have their spheres of influence.”

Good article except for that piece of nastiness.


3 posted on 08/11/2008 10:01:18 PM PDT by KantianBurke (President Bush, why did you abandon Specialist Ahmed Qusai al-Taei?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tony.mcdonald

OK OK already! I’m crouching down with my head between my legs under my imaginary schooldesk! Reagan never happened. I get it! Russian slavery for me baby!


4 posted on 08/11/2008 10:02:46 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tony.mcdonald
That’s the point really. Nations have their spheres of influence. Monroe long ago declared that ours was the Western hemisphere – a pretty big ‘sphere’ if you ask me. If we have the authority to maintain things the way we want them around our country, what business do we have telling Russia what they can or can’t do with or to their neighbors?

Well then, getting to the point, how many of our neighbors in the Western Hemisphere have we invaded and occupied?

5 posted on 08/11/2008 10:03:14 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tony.mcdonald
It's simple, probably too simple for a liberal to understand. We have a mutual security deal with Georgia, a Democratic country. We were sponsoring Georgia for NATO membership. Russia is obviously trying to rebuild the Soviet Union.

The rest is all about oil. Russia has decided to give the left-nuts a real WAR FOR OIL, and they don't seem to want to rise to the occasion. They also seem to be committing war crimes, again no show from the world's foremost protesters. Maybe the left could spare a few volunteer human shields, to stand in front of the Russian tanks in Gori, that would help.

6 posted on 08/11/2008 10:03:31 PM PDT by Tarpon (Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Panama , Greneda off the top of my head.


7 posted on 08/11/2008 10:05:33 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Socialism will destroy a country economically. why dems & Mccain for Socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Actually, at the moment, WE are being invaded.....


8 posted on 08/11/2008 10:07:28 PM PDT by Hi Heels (Now here at the Rock we have two rules. Rule #1 obey all rules. Rule #2 no writing on the walls...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

So sorry, did those episodes temporarily interupt your drug supplies.


9 posted on 08/11/2008 10:09:39 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

Go ahead and develop that.


10 posted on 08/11/2008 10:10:32 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tony.mcdonald
How is fighting Commies NOT in our national interest. Geez. If we followed the author's advice we'd still be in detente.
11 posted on 08/11/2008 10:12:00 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
Hey, do you feel "occupied?"

And do you want some good updates on this Georgia thing, or are you ok?

12 posted on 08/11/2008 10:13:25 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
“Nations have their spheres of influence.” Good article except for that piece of nastiness.

Comes just before, "We need living space."

13 posted on 08/11/2008 10:13:42 PM PDT by unspun (Mike Huckabee: Government's job is "protect us, not have to provide for us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

No I supported those invasions and I wish Bush would invade Cuba, Venezuela and the rest of socialist countries in our hemisphere as they are spreading socailism, toppling the dominoes in our hemisphere.


14 posted on 08/11/2008 10:15:30 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Socialism will destroy a country economically. why dems & Mccain for Socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

Really? Panama and Grenada are “occupied”?? Do you get your news from keith Olbermann?


15 posted on 08/11/2008 10:18:20 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

No I supported those invasions and I wish Bush would invade Cuba, Venezuela and the rest of socialist countries in our hemisphere as these countries are spreading socialism, toppling the dominoes in our hemisphere.


16 posted on 08/11/2008 10:20:59 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Socialism will destroy a country economically. why dems & Mccain for Socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

Well, then, thanks for clearing that up.


17 posted on 08/11/2008 10:22:41 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

“While he may be a real threat to his neighbors, he hardly seems to be plotting the same sort of international takeover that the communists desired. “

Oy vey!!! - Tarpon, you’re right, his quite obvious goal is to restore the “USSR” to its original power and dominance. And to the original poster, quoted above - yes he IS aspiring to international takeover. It’s a known and historical fact that Putin, Chavez, Ahmedinejad and Jong-il have had regular summits and meetings for quite awhile now, all with the commonality of hatred for the West, specifically the U.S.

People can make fun of the phrase “Axis of Evil” - but just as in WWII, THIS is another one. It’s real. Ignore at our own peril.


18 posted on 08/11/2008 10:25:11 PM PDT by llandres (I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Lets see Mexico (Mexican War and 1914 Pershing invasion) Haiti several times, Dominican Republic, Cuba, Spain, Panama, Honduras.

Russians isn’t doing anything that we haven’t done repeatedly in our own backyard.

Now with Mexican troops crossing the border repeatedly and Mexico slipping into anarchy. And with more and more of South America being taken over by Chavez cronies I must ask what is more in our national interest?

Saving four million Georgians from Russian control or twenty three million Venezuela citizens from Chavez?

History is going to judge Americans the biggest suckers if we don’t pay attention to enemies much closer to our borders than are in the Republic of Georgia


19 posted on 08/11/2008 10:26:25 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

Thanks for your post, and RIGHT ON!!!! I hope we pull out of NATO and the Pacific alliance as well. What the hell do these alliances do for us? COMMUNISM IS DONE! There is no upside here for the US, only downside. We should give the Europeans what we give Israel: a few billion in weapons. No American troops. Sink or swim, the second world war ended 60 years ago. And we should also help them for all the help in Afghanistan and Iraq. I can’t believe “conservatives” are supporting intervention.


20 posted on 08/11/2008 10:28:50 PM PDT by ashamed_NewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson