Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/08/2008 3:30:59 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: drzz

1. FBI futile search at Fort Detrick http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE6DB133AF931A35754C0A9659C8B63

2. ABC reporter, Hatfill claiming he could prove Iraqi involvement in anthrax mailings http://www.anthraxinvestigation.com/Hatfill116-2.pdf

3. UNSCOM Richard Spertzel to Laurie Mylroie : “Iraq has its dirty hands in this event” http://www.lauriemylroie.com/files/Spertzel_on_Shoham_Jacobsen2.htm

4. “Anthrax mailings in retrospect”, Journal of Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence, March 2007 issue
http://newsdetails.blogspot.com/2007/05/technical-intelligence-in-retrospect.html


2 posted on 08/08/2008 3:33:42 AM PDT by drzz (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drzz; backhoe
Hannity once mentioned that the handwriting on the anthrax letters was blocky and childlike. I hadn't heard anything lately about letter analysis. If he acted ‘alone’, then it had to be his handwriting, right?
4 posted on 08/08/2008 3:48:09 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hang in there, Obama! We don't want you to lose until after the convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drzz

If former weapons inspector says that Ivins could not have made the weaponized anthrax by himself, or at the very least without someone else in on it, then I take him at his word.

He would be the one to know..


11 posted on 08/08/2008 4:43:08 AM PDT by PaRepub07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drzz

The story we’ve been reading is flagrant BS.


14 posted on 08/08/2008 5:09:27 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drzz
The genetic technique that has been mentioned IS capable of pinpointing the source of the anthrax to a specific strain. I tend to believe that the specimen did come from Ivins'lab. The lypholizer he purchased could have easily converted a broth culture of the organism to the more easily dispersed spores. He had a vested interest in creating an "anthrax scare" so that he could keep getting the funding he was receiving for working on a new vaccine.

Whether he could have pulled this off on his own is much more problematic. He could have been just the source of the anthrax and been financially rewarded by those who actually did the "dirty work". If he did indeed commit suicide, guilt from knowing that five people died from exposure to the anthrax that he provided and/or the knowledge that he was being investigated and was about to be charged would have been reason enough for an unstable person to take his own life.
22 posted on 08/08/2008 7:08:11 AM PDT by srmorton (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drzz

The Ivins “suicide” smelled rotten to me from the beginning.
Something about the way it’s reported—I had the same feeling when Dan Rather first mentioned the forged memo in September of 2004.


27 posted on 08/08/2008 5:57:15 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Liberalism is service to the self disguised as service to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson