Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...

FYI ~~ comment from Donofrio about Post & Email site

________________________________

John Charlton Says:
October 9, 2009 at 8:17 PM

Leo,

A concerned citizen just got this reply from the AG’s office in HI about the nbc issue:

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/hi-attorney-generals-office-denies-policies-on-nbc/

Would beg your input on what this response means (something that I could quote you on, at the Post & Email).

*******

[ed. My input is that I do not have any faith in you - Mr. John Charlton - or your publication the Post and Email. I suspect your blog’s motivation for existing is directly opposite to the intention of my blog.

As of today, October 9, 2009 you are permanently banned from commenting at this blog. You have the sole honor of that ban to yourself. No other person or journal has earned this distinction. As far as I am concerned, you no longer even exist in the blogosphere.

I do not trust you and I find your attempt to jump from journalist to lawyer arrogant, suspicious and very sad. I will not grace your Seussian Hooplah with another glance. I encourage my readers to ignore your dangerously misleading legal analysis.

No future links to your blog will be posted here. All prior links will remain although this statement will be added as an update. I will not attempt to revise history and erase my prior - very mistaken - support of your blog.

Readers, there appears to be a very well coordinated attempt in the blogosphere to control damage which my recent reports and legal analysis have generated in opposition to the official Hawaii DoH story.

Rest assured, the Hawaii Attorney General’s office provided an opinion to the DoH which was recorded. Both I and another researcher received an official response from Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine a few days ago which clearly denied access to the letter concerning the “natural born citizen” statement made by Fukino on July 27, 2009. It acknowledged the existence of this opinion while claiming attorney client privilege thereto. When the time is right, I will publish on this issue. For the time being, my research and evidence gathering continue.

The question discussed at Mr. Charlton’s blog which was allegedly sent to Nagamine contains one of the most horribly constructed queries one could ever dream up - a true work of Seussian Hooplah which conveniently allowed the “no records exist” answer she gave.

Here is the misleading question sent to the AG’s office:

“I am requesting...Final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders made in the adjudication of cases, except to the extent protected by section 92F-13(1), which contain any mention of “natural born citizen” issued by your department in the last 10 years...”

Since the AG will argue that the opinion her office provided to Director Fukino is subject to the protection of 92F-13(1), Nagamine responded that no records exist responsive to that request.

The question above left wiggle room the size of ten football fields for one to slip through. The question appears to have been devised for just that purpose. I can assure you that no serious inquisitor would ever issue a question so devoid of teeth as the one above. Rest assured, the question I asked and to which she responded left no wiggle room.

Do not be distracted. Seussian Hooplah is coming from enemies of the truth as well as those who purport to be in search of the truth. Be aware of it. Understand it. Expose it.

We have them cornered. I couldn’t be more encouraged. Rarely do you get to see the fruits of your labor confirmed in this way. Usually, the suspects keep their mouths shut. But when you place a rat in a corner, he has no choice but to attack. By attacking - they admit to having been placed in a corner.

I expect continuing deception on many levels, but I feel energized that this blog has struck fear in the hearts of those opposed to truth. They are now forced to expose themselves. People sell their souls so easily these days. Who knows how far the rot goes? But for anyone with a desire for truth, the truth will be crystal clear.

The awakening is upon us. But puss must first come to the surface for the infection to heal. Let it come. This is a cleansing process.

Getting the truth to you is my burden. What you do with that truth is yours.

Leo C. Donofrio, Citizen Attorney 10.09.2009 9:14 PM ET]

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/uipa-request-5-from-leo-c-donofrio/#comment-14255


8,483 posted on 10/09/2009 9:14:27 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8482 | View Replies ]


To: STARWISE
Thanks for the ping. Just read this on Leo's site that I thought you would be interested in: constitutionallyspeaking Says: October 9, 2009 at 10:13 PM BAM! Go Get ‘Em LEO! BTW, just curious after reading the 3 different certs Justin got. I will be awaiting your commentary on the differences in language. Especially the difference of the wording of the Hawaiian DNC: 2000: This is to certify that the following cadidates for President & V. President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution. 2004: “identical to 2000″ 2008: This is to certify that the following candidates for President and V. President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Party balloting at the Preference Poll and Caucus. What the H*LL is that? What happened to the ‘ legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution”. Why just the “qualified under party balloting preferences”? Maybe it isn’t the national cert one needs to concentrate on, I would be looking into why the change in the state of Hawaii DNC cert? The National DNC certs seem to be out of conformity. And what is with that little exclamation point behind the qualified under the US Constitution on the 2008 cert mean. I am getting that little mark behind all my response from my Dem. Senator in DC now too. Are we hitting a nerve? Also, after looking over all certs, including Republican ones, it would seem that there is definitely an inconsistency with the DNC. What it means I have no clue, but I am sure Justin & Leo are on it. [ed. we hit a nerve with reverse analysis. the puss is starting to flow.] (end snip) hmmmmmm.......or should I say: 'mmm...mmm....mmm' (sorry for no paragraphs..for some reason they are not working this morning)
8,484 posted on 10/10/2009 6:47:26 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8483 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson