Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
Thanks for the ping. Just read this on Leo's site that I thought you would be interested in: constitutionallyspeaking Says: October 9, 2009 at 10:13 PM BAM! Go Get ‘Em LEO! BTW, just curious after reading the 3 different certs Justin got. I will be awaiting your commentary on the differences in language. Especially the difference of the wording of the Hawaiian DNC: 2000: This is to certify that the following cadidates for President & V. President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution. 2004: “identical to 2000″ 2008: This is to certify that the following candidates for President and V. President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Party balloting at the Preference Poll and Caucus. What the H*LL is that? What happened to the ‘ legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution”. Why just the “qualified under party balloting preferences”? Maybe it isn’t the national cert one needs to concentrate on, I would be looking into why the change in the state of Hawaii DNC cert? The National DNC certs seem to be out of conformity. And what is with that little exclamation point behind the qualified under the US Constitution on the 2008 cert mean. I am getting that little mark behind all my response from my Dem. Senator in DC now too. Are we hitting a nerve? Also, after looking over all certs, including Republican ones, it would seem that there is definitely an inconsistency with the DNC. What it means I have no clue, but I am sure Justin & Leo are on it. [ed. we hit a nerve with reverse analysis. the puss is starting to flow.] (end snip) hmmmmmm.......or should I say: 'mmm...mmm....mmm' (sorry for no paragraphs..for some reason they are not working this morning)
8,484 posted on 10/10/2009 6:47:26 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8483 | View Replies ]


To: penelopesire

Very curious, isn’t it. I, too, have puzzled
over the HI Demo party’s language .. meaning
and reason.


8,485 posted on 10/10/2009 10:28:58 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8484 | View Replies ]

To: penelopesire

#8484 - That certification language is just amazing. WHO but who is watching over the United States Elections process??? Right now I would have to conclude the DNC and any state that feels it has a right to “redefine” things. Unbelieveable. Is America REALLY going to put up with this? Really? CO


8,672 posted on 11/08/2009 4:23:15 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8484 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson