Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
This thinking ... “Thy myth isn’t busted until Obama releases both sides of the document” ... is WRONG. Until Obama releases exactly what you want you have suspicions but thats all. that’s why the myth remains busted - you CANNOT simple concoct ‘evidence’ out of your own suspicions, theories and rumors.

And that is where you are wrong.

Obama has not released anything at all, no matter how you want to dress up the document on the Kos and Smear sites. Obama linked to an invalid web artifact and demands that the rest of us accept it as legal and valid substitute for a physical document with clear certifications. I don't have to concoct any evidence at all, because Obama has not offered any legal evidence in the first place.

But Obama has concocted evidence, as it clearly is not the physical certified document that the state of Hawaii says it only deals in, but a web image of only one side of a claimed document. Until Obama provides the real thing to an authoritative body, only he is concocting evidence.

-PJ

3,275 posted on 07/13/2008 9:27:17 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3274 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

“Obama has not released anything at all, no matter how you want to dress up the document on the Kos and Smear sites. Obama linked to an invalid web artifact”

You don’t know it’s ‘invalid’.

“But Obama has concocted evidence”
His campaign has released evidence, a scan of his COLB that says he was born in Hawaii. You cannot prove its legit without seeing the original and noboy has come even close to proving its a forgery.

” as it clearly is not the physical certified document”
Its impossible to ‘release’ a physical document on the web.

” demands that the rest of us accept it as legal and valid substitute”
He is not demanding any such thing. He is merely using a copy of his COLB to attest to his place of birth.

“I don’t have to concoct any evidence at all, because Obama has not offered any legal evidence in the first place.”
Were we in a courtroom and the burden was on him to prove it, I’d agree that he has not proven it beyond a reasonable doubt. But that still leaves the fact that *all* you have right now are doubts. The previous claims that ‘proved’ it was a forgery for various reasons? They were busted.


3,338 posted on 07/13/2008 11:16:11 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson