I was teasing you a bit, as I didn't realize you were a newbie, and simply didn't know. I thought you were getting a little over excited and simply forgot.
FWIW, I'm also far from convinced that the so-called wedding photo (It's not a wedding photo, It's just her in a white/light colored dress that was in an article near a block of text that mentions her wedding. It wasn't a caption.) and the 'maybe Malik' photo were taken in 1961.
I suspect they are photos from the 1971/72 trip.
Nothing looks quite so much like the inside of an air terminal as another air terminal...
In the absence of anything definitive the family photos are a side issue.
The real issue is where was the kid born?
All we have to prove his place of birth is a poor resolution, obviously forged document posted on a "progressive" website.
Besides his own stop the smears site's use of this "document", nothing else placing his birth in Honolulu has been offered or discovered.
Nothing.
I find that very odd.
Especially given that the first confirmed Baby 'Bama sighting is 2500 miles away.
Especially given that there are unconfirmed reports of family being at his birth in Kenya.
Especially given that there are no reports, confirmed or otherwise, of anyone being at his birth in Hawai'i. No family. No bestest girlfriend. No neighbors. No relatives. No nobody.
Especially given that "they" went through some considerable effort to track down and threaten someone for daring to post a petition to have Barak show his real birth certificate.
You don't attract that kind of attention when you're far, far from any embarrassing truth.
Reason I think the “wedding picture” is probably taken proximate in time to the marriage is because she is so young. I see my son’s girl friends in this age group (20-22)regularly; you might convince me she was 20 here but she isn’t much more than that. Pregnant? Who knows—maybe just a Honolulu dress a couple years later. But it isn’t very long after; under the circumstances, I am on the bet Obama’s representation is probably correct.