Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: David; PhatHead
"That's what the fake Birth Certificates say. I have assumed there is some smoke behind the information on the fake certificates--on August 8, 1961, someone filed something with birth data on it."

David, yes there appears to be some smoke, but the date filed is not it. I was born on such and such a date and the date mine was filed was 14 days later. It all depends on how long the orginal information gets to Health Dept Vital Statistics to be filed.

1,993 posted on 07/06/2008 6:52:57 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky

“David, yes there appears to be some smoke, but the date filed is not it. I was born on such and such a date and the date mine was filed was 14 days later. It all depends on how long the orginal information gets to Health Dept Vital Statistics to be filed. “

My original Certified BC has the filed date as 5 days BEFORE I was born!! This was just a typo, of course, but Motor Vehicles rejected it. I was only 17 and I started crying, and some guy felt sorry for me and went into the back room to talk to the supervisor. It turned out the supervisor knew my uncle and that my uncle had a brother with a daughter. They let it go through. The certified copy I have now, that I obtained directly from the courthouse copy, has the correct dates on it. The point is, is that even a certified copy may have innocent errors on it.


2,085 posted on 07/07/2008 5:41:13 AM PDT by Lynne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1993 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson