I am actually wondering if our threads are helping tune the information.
Everytime we find conflicts, I've seen source articles change.
I am actually wondering if our threads are helping tune the information.
Absolutely!
I can tell you from direct experience that even the best sources can get it wrong.
It is the readers' sharp eyes that recognize and question errors in the accumulated body of articles -- just as Fred Nerks did above -- every time an error is identified, then the research to correct it can begin.
Oddly enough, the Obama supporters that just don't go "lies, lies, lies," but point out inconsistencies, have been invaluable in this effort.
I want website to be as correct as humanly possible.
The Obama File
:"I am actually wondering if our threads are helping tune the information. Everytime we find conflicts, I've seen source articles change.
Seems the dims have managed to get a working model of the Rovian weather machine and modified it as an Obomination generator.