Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Here's the image. I think I'm beginning to see what you are getting at. Say that again...slowly...I'm tired!

1,662 posted on 07/06/2008 3:22:26 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1660 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks
So, say the baby was one when this picture was taken and Barry has at least his permanent primary and secondary incisors and maybe even his canines in this photo. This would put his age anywhere between 7-9 for the incisors and 10-11 if those are permanent canines. So, in this photo he is at least 6 years older than that baby, if the baby is one year old. Given that, then one of the following must be true:

1. If the baby was born in 1963, then Barry had to have been born in 1957 at the latest, because there is no possible way that he is 3 years old in this photo.

2. If Barry had been born in 1961 as claimed, then this baby had to have been born in 1967. Has anyone seen his sister's birth certificate?

3. If the baby in this photo is really his sister and she was really born in 1963 and Barry's mom was actually as old as claimed when she died, then he would have to have been conceived when she was about 11, not 17. Has anyone seen his mother's birth or death certificate?

Additional question, since Soetero adopted him, when did Barry get his name legally changed to Obama?
1,683 posted on 07/06/2008 4:31:53 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1662 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson