To: RetSignman
,
To: tapatio
odd,,,weren’t those supposed to be at different times,,looks like the same to me.
To: tapatio
If those were taken at different times, I am a monkey's uncle. Heck even the agent in the background is the same guy. So what we can conclude is the picture purported to be a ‘wedding’ photo taken shortly after their marriage is a false presumption.
1,040 posted on
07/04/2008 7:13:44 PM PDT by
EBH
( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
To: tapatio; expatguy; SE Mom
1,042 posted on
07/04/2008 7:14:40 PM PDT by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: tapatio
1,045 posted on
07/04/2008 7:15:57 PM PDT by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: tapatio
Nice catch! So- is the conclusion that some (not so bright) journalist labeled this as a wedding photo when clearly it wasn’t?
1,050 posted on
07/04/2008 7:17:16 PM PDT by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: tapatio
Thanks for the improved pictures...this is weirder and weirder all the time, isn’t it?
1,054 posted on
07/04/2008 7:20:46 PM PDT by
RetSignman
(DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
To: tapatio; Spunky
Spunky, see Tapatio’s side by side. That isn't HNL, it's San Francisco and the kid looks preteen.
Thanks Tapatio
1,060 posted on
07/04/2008 7:25:51 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson