To: PJ-Comix
"Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto have interpretations that are very similar to Mercury, Venus, and Mars respectively." I wonder how they did all this in 1929, before Pluto was even discovered? Must have been some CYA going on they found another planet mucking up their charts...
6 posted on
06/13/2008 6:31:44 AM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Abathar
I wonder how they did all this in 1929, before Pluto was even discovered? Must have been some CYA going on they found another planet mucking up their charts... And with Pluto subsequently being declared a non-planet it must have gotten even worse.
14 posted on
06/13/2008 7:01:38 AM PDT by
jalisco555
("My 80% friend is not my 20% enemy" - Ronald Reagan)
To: Abathar; PJ-Comix
I wonder how they did all this in 1929, before Pluto was even discovered? Must have been some CYA going on they found another planet mucking up their charts... And I also wonder how they're compensating for the fact that Pluto has now been "demoted", and is no longer considered to be a planet?
52 posted on
06/13/2008 8:30:04 AM PDT by
Purrcival
(This post was brought to you by the letter "a")
To: Abathar
It’s worse than that. Their charts assume that the Sun and planets revolve around the Earth.
86 posted on
06/13/2008 5:50:52 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson