Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan

All this talk is irritating to me, because there are some people out there who actually care about winning the war on terror. And the Republican Party in general and John McCain in particular remain our best hope of doing that.

Too often, we make the perfect the enemy of the good. If you don’t think John McCain is ideologically pure enough, that’s fine. But, we’re fighting a war. Human lives hang in the balance. One of two men will take office in January — one will retreat from islamic extremists and the other will accept only victory. That’s the question of this election!


9 posted on 06/08/2008 7:42:14 AM PDT by army2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: army2008

“All this talk is irritating to me, because there are some people out there who actually care about winning the war on terror.”

But for those of us who believe that the WoT will be won as much within the USA as in Iraq and all foreign nations put together, McCain looks far less tough than he pretends to be.

The twin towers were not in Baghdad. McCain’s open borders, no enforcement polices on immigration pose far more danger to US security against terrorism than anything happening overseas.


14 posted on 06/08/2008 7:49:10 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: army2008

Lets see. We barely pass funding legislation now (and sometimes delayed by a month) with the congress we have.

Do you honestly think McCain will get funding passed with a +70 margin in the house and filibuster proof senate?

Naivety will be the GOP’s undoing.


19 posted on 06/08/2008 7:57:38 AM PDT by Crazieman (Vote Juan McAmnesty in 2008! Because freedom abroad is more important than freedom at home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: army2008

What about the war here in this country with open borders?You think winning the war on terror is going to make us any safer with mcnutts kooky amnesty/open borders,restrictions on free speech etc.


23 posted on 06/08/2008 8:08:53 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: army2008
Too often, we make the perfect the enemy of the good. If you don’t think John McCain is ideologically pure enough, that’s fine. But, we’re fighting a war. Human lives hang in the balance. One of two men will take office in January — one will retreat from islamic extremists and the other will accept only victory. That’s the question of this election!

To say that my issue with McCain is that he "isn't ideologically pure enough" is laughable. On many extremely important issues such as free speech and illegal immigration, he is farther to the left than many liberals. I'm not at all certain that he will name solid constructionists to the SCOTUS. His track record indicates otherwise.

Now that might sound harsh, but it pales in comparison to what Senator McCain has had to say about me over the years.

As I said, I might accept the nickle an hour I'm being offered vice the $40/hr I want, but don't tell me I'm just parsing minor issues and that I need to smile as I work.

25 posted on 06/08/2008 8:11:41 AM PDT by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: army2008

“Too often, we make the perfect the enemy of the good.”

McCain is neither. What he MIGHT be is (slightly) less disastrous than the OTHER socialist.


41 posted on 06/08/2008 2:51:58 PM PDT by Grunthor (Hey McCain, no reach-around, no vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson