Posted on 05/18/2008 4:11:08 AM PDT by nutspea
I do not know if this article suit to be posted here, but I just want to speak something.
Today when I went to NYT and an review attracted my attention, title "fed up with peace" (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/18/opinion/18kristof.html). This article frightens me. There it covered a monk who claimed that he( Dalai Lama) has been too peaceful over the China, and they should take some actions more violent, especially when he is gone. It depicts that this impatience seems widespread among young Tibetans , and remarks that the Dalai Lama should return Tibet as a spiritual leader and own more rights. Most important, it also observes, that China government should stop sending Han migrants to all Tibetan areas, to preserve their Tibetan character.
After finished reading I think there is a need to leave comments. To prevent wasting the time, I just want to ask the author one question, that is: You call for more rights to Tibet, but did you ever ask yourself such a question that to whom is this freedom belong? To judge the affairs in Tibet one must consult the history instead of vainly murmuring about the present. Don't you think it's weird that in the process of "free Tibet" movement only several monks and oversea persons stand up, instead of masses of Tibetans? After informed yourself with the past history of serfs in Tibet when ruled by these Lamas, could you tell me to whom is this freedom would be given if the Tibet is once again ruled by monks?
About the last remark of migrants, it makes me a little confused that as I can remember American always support culture diversity and communication. One thought in your head and another in mine, but if we make changes there go more than two. The same, the collision of culture will result more thoughts and help both the Han people and Tibetans, isn't it? Does it benifit the Tibetans more by isolating them?
However,thanks to Internet, the propaganda of CCP doesn’t work as effective as before because we have more chance to know the truth from BBC, CNN, and so forth, though the GFW really cause some troubles when we visit a foreign website(For example we cannot visit Wiki).
the only difference between CNN and CCTV is that CCTV place the tag of “narrow-minded” on its head while CNN hides the tag of “prejudice” under its underwear.
You have proved yourself to be dishonest so I really don’t care what you say
According to what Dalai and you said, Liangshang should belong to “Great Tibet”....
Here is a the official website of Haixi Mongol Autonomous Prefecture,most of which inhabitant are Mongol. Those Mongols have lived here for 700+ years.
But Dalai and You also insist that it should belong to “Greater Tibet”.........
http://www.haixi.gov.cn/structure/index
the link of enlish offical website of Xining city,where Dalai insist that it should be a part of “Great Tibet”.
http://www.xining.gov.cn/English/English_1.html
Get lost, Crawling Duck.
What is Wiki? Why is is banned?
It is a website like an encyclopedia. The CCP banned it because there is something they don't want us know. For example, they don't want us know their bloody deeds done in June 4th, 1989.
How do you know what happened June 4th, 1989?
Thanks to the proxy, I can visit some of the banned websites. However, it doesn’t work all the time.
Inner Mongolia should be an independent country that’s separate from China. IF they, due to their Tiberian Buddhist tradition, want to be a part of Greater Tibet, that’s their choice as a sovereign and independent nation.
In either case, you chicoms have no business in Inner Mongolia either. Get out and stay out, CCP maniacs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.