Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fichori

“Do you consider the possibility that living things, as Designed, did not initially kill each other?”

It wouldn’t really matter. If I design a machine that immediately goes bad on its, it’s a bad design.

Hank


145 posted on 05/01/2008 6:02:31 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Hank Kerchief

"It wouldn’t really matter. If I design a machine that immediately goes bad on its, it’s a bad design."


But you wouldn't be designing a machine that had free choice, would you.


If man was designed to not make mistakes, he would not have free choice.


That is what makes man different from machines, man has the freedom to chose.

Machines do not.
172 posted on 05/01/2008 10:42:58 AM PDT by Fichori (Truth is non-negotiable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: Hank Kerchief

“Do you consider the possibility that living things, as Designed, did not initially kill each other?”

"It wouldn’t really matter. If I design a machine that immediately goes bad on its, it’s a bad design.

Hank"


Something I should have thought of earlier but didn't.

What if the Designer is Sovereign, and knowing that the Designs would ultimately break down, degrade and make bad decisions, chose to go ahead with the Designs anyway?

What if the Designer didn't want a 'perfect machine' that would last for eternity?

What if our idea of a perfect design is not what he had in mind?

If the Designer is indeed Sovereign, would not it be his prerogative?

175 posted on 05/01/2008 12:19:01 PM PDT by Fichori (Truth is non-negotiable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson