Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

You must have misunderstood.

Those arguing FOR the teaching of evolution argued that both sides should be taught in the interest of academic freedom. Of course, this was disingenuous.

Funny that atheists/evolutionists claim the mantel of science and claim that anyone who doesn’t reject a Creator is not a scientist, when, not only the founders of modern science referred to a Creator, but the FOUNDATIONS of modern science itself rely on the concepts of the Judeo-Christian God.


199 posted on 04/21/2008 11:52:53 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
Funny that atheists/evolutionists claim the mantel of science and claim that anyone who doesn’t reject a Creator is not a scientist, when, not only the founders of modern science referred to a Creator, but the FOUNDATIONS of modern science itself rely on the concepts of the Judeo-Christian God.

Those espousing creationism aren't scientists, any more than those promoting evolution are theologians. And those who say all evolutionist are atheist are merely fools.

201 posted on 04/21/2008 12:07:27 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson