[Soliton]

Darwin’s book was “On The Origin of Species”. I just gave you a concrete example of non-designed speciation proving Darwin correct.

It’s your turn. Give me anything empirical supportin ID. Anything.

[ConservaTexan]

Since there is concrete proof of 'non-designed speciation proving Darwin correct,' why is it still widely referred to as the Theory of Evolution? Shouldn't it be called Darwin's Law, or Darwin's Law of Evolution or even Solition's Law of Evolution? I do not have a problem with Origin of Species, my objections are with Descent of Man.

As for ID, there is as much empirical evidence for ID, as there is for all life evolving from the same single microorganism, hence, the conundrum. I, however, have no trouble admitting that.