[ConservaTexan]

Since there is concrete proof of 'non-designed speciation proving Darwin correct,' why is it still widely referred to as the Theory of Evolution? Shouldn't it be called Darwin's Law, or Darwin's Law of Evolution or even Solition's Law of Evolution? I do not have a problem with Origin of Species, my objections are with Descent of Man.

As for ID, there is as much empirical evidence for ID, as there is for all life evolving from the same single microorganism, hence, the conundrum. I, however, have no trouble admitting that.

[Soliton]

why is it still widely referred to as the Theory of Evolution

You seem like a nice person, but I don't have the time to explain scientific method to you. I have asked every proponent of ID for evidence and no one has even tried. Good night

[tokenatheist]

In science Theories have greater standing than Laws.