OK. Try this one. Why did he choose that moment to start recording? By the time the cop comes over, the recording is already at 1:07.
Geez. Almost like he knew something was going to happen, huh?
But wait. Answering that would require you to think! Can you do that? Are you capable? Ooooh. Too risky. Hitting abuse would be easier.
Nah, I’m not going to hit abuse, you’re providing too much humor even though I’ve been up most of the night with this (I’m in Asia right now).
The lot is only 5 minutes from his house. He probably turned it on soon after leaving his neighborhood.
Let’s break it down to steps.
1. He leaves his house
2. Gets in his car
3. Probably calls friend to let her know he’s on his way
4. Hangs up phone (please don’t start a discussion on whether it was hands free or not)
5. He’s almost to the lot
6. Turns on recorder (I believe he stated in an earlier threat that he turns it on when ever he goes driving.)
7. Is nearing the lot
8. Signals his turn
9. Goes in
You know the rest. Had he turned on the camera any later the disgraced offer could then claim probable cause (as he tried). However we got to see the turn signals.
He would probably have turned it on earlier, but most likely was distracted. If you want a better answer try asking Brett himself, he seems like a real stand-up guy.
Maybe the next time I’m out in the St. Louis area he’ll let me buy him a beer (he should be 21 by then, just so you don’t get your panties in a bunch)
Is the recording at 1:07, or is it 1:07 into the fraction of the recording you're looking at?
Is that timestamp on the video itself, or just on the media player window? Do you understand the difference?
Geez. Almost like he knew something was going to happen, huh?
But wait. Answering that would require you to think! Can you do that? Are you capable? Ooooh. Too risky. Hitting abuse would be easier.
Why not ask Darrow rather than just throw wild accusations around? If I recall correctly, on a previous thread, he says that the camera is always on.
He didn't post whatever happened in his car for the time before 1:07 because it wasn't relevant. I'm sure people want to watch someone drive around for half an hour doing nothing just to satisfiy your idiotic claims.
I'm constantly amazed at how far you will reach to defend a jackboot.
My video camera is on all of the time. I even posted this back in Jan. 07 in another thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1761977/posts?page=640#640
“The camera is ALWAYS rolling while I drive my car at night now and most of the time during the day. The reason for this is because I’ve had my rights trampled numerous times even while kissing a$$. I’ve also had officers just make up reasons to stop me (straight up lie about what I did) because I was young, it was late, and they were looking to search a car without probable cause. I’ve tried asserting my rights, but have been threaten with arrest (like I was here) and told it would be the officers’ word vs. mine”
This situation is just another reason why. Do you think I’m the only young person that has had problems with the police? I’m sure all the others that don’t have a tape of their bad dealings with the police are lying, right?
I figured if I had the 5 minutes of driving up until this point, 75% of people would have just shut it off.