Posted on 04/06/2007 4:09:44 AM PDT by drzz
The MSM is still destroying the White House, the Bush administration and the War on Terror.
Today, the Washington Post claims that a memo from the Department of State denies any ties with Saddam and Al-Quaeda.
Since 9/11, the CIA is constantly denying every ties between terrorism and Iraq, even when the Iraqi governement claims these evidences are overhelming, like the VP Cheney admitted in 2004 (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5233810) and like the deputy prime minister of Iraq repeated after the Senate lies in last september. Even Bin Laden's mentor himself admitted : http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/710goolj.asp?pg=2
Now it is clear that liberals will deny every links between Iraq and AQ and terrorism. Earlier this week, the House led by Dems forbid the word "Global War on Terror" from the reports about Iraq.
Dems have linked the defeat of Iraq with their electoral success, they have linked a situation against the national interests of the United States security with their own political agenda.
The situation is grave. Please e-mail the White House and urge the Bush administration to stand up against this new lies denying the links between Saddam Hussein's regime and Al-Quaeda :
comments@whitehouse.gov
The Post is not discussins an issue, he is making propaganda against the War on Terror, in order to let American people think the War is not worth winning, that the War on Terror has nothing to do with Iraq.
Don't let this happen, or the next American jumping from a hit building could be YOU.
No, one should lift up his voice like a trumpet and cry aloud . . . AND vote. Before all . . . PRAY!
I am amused. If everyone shuts up there won’t be a Free Republic . . . either site or nation.
The other day I was told on these pages that I was a judgmental prude. Of course I am! Where would these platforms be without people making judgments, and stating them. It’s one thing to express strong disagreement, but I’ll never tell another person on these pages to “shut up.”
And “prude.” Without some prudes, the Republic Party would be altogether the Democratic Party instead of the current Virtual Democratic Party that it is.
I disagree that someone should stop crying, or that they should shut up.
Please CRY! Please lift up your voices. Please pray. Please vote.
excellent point
I was beginning to feel a bit of derangement coming on myself
Would you like to get into the pool. What will Bush be blamed for next?
I’m one of the greatest Bush supporter of FR.
But I’m tired to defend him when he does not counter-attack when needed.
Saddam-AQ ties is an important issue. I’m looking forward to hearing him or his administration about this point.
I even wrote to the White House to urge the administration to react.
If I didn’t like Bush, I wouldn’t urge him to stand up.
Blah, blah, blah...
Bush, Bush, Bush...
So on and so on and so on...
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Go back to bed sucker
I think the problem now is if the administration starts defending itself there is no end to it ,They would spend all their time defending against baseless charges...and the charges are getting wilder and wilder. Better to stay focused on what needs to get done ...winning this war.
also Cheney is still out there saying clearly what needs to be said
He was never an effective communicator. WE know the mainstream media and Hollyweird have a personal agenda in slanting the news, but listening to Bush speak is a painful experience, reminiscent of Ford.
The information and data are all there, but he is totally incapable of articulating it effectively, nor does he appear to have a spokesperson capable or willing enough to do so for him.
I think the Bush administration made a number of very serious mistakes in the CONDUCT of the war in Iraq, not in the INITIATION of that war. What they are doing NOW should have been done well BEFORE the primary elections. It MIGHT have had an impact.
But at heart I think Bush and his family are typical northeastern closet liberal RINOs and that is the problem. You need an administration with a "killer instinct" when it comes to our border violations and the conduct of the war in the Middle East. This one does not.
I agree with DRZZ on this.
Yes but the Democrats’s strategy is to erase the past to influence the future.
To erase the link between Iraq and the WoT is to erase the main point of WWIV : that radical islam lauched an international war against the free world.
Instead of seeing this, Dems are pretending the war is only located in Afghanistan, and America should negociate with all others nations that actually support terrorism.
This issue is important. Without the past, the present means nothing, and the future is in jeopardy.
Sucker... I haven't heard that since the seventies.
No, I am wide awake and I think I will stay right here on your thread and defend the President from "fans" like you.
You can post picture after picture... but I think your headline has betrayed you.
Yep : some said the fact Bush does not answer to his critics is a quality.
It becomes a default.
See the Weekly Standard :
‘Kick Me’? Bush needs to fight back. by Bill Krisol
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/479rhgig.asp
My blog proves I deeply appreciate the President.
I’m also a friend of a French university professor, former adviser of Ronald Reagan, and a close friend of neoconservatives (Blankley, Kristol, Podhoretz, Horowitz...). He has written many book to support the President.
Look at my blog, Bush is cheered every two days.
I think you are rightabout what the Democrats are trying to do ...and I personally do buy any of the stuff about this war being mis managed (what war has been well managed?)
But to the victor goes the spoils ..and if Bush reshapes the middle east by successfully completing this war I dont care what the Democrats think ...it will be forgotten
should read
and I personally do not buy any ....
Except the fact that Dems are re-writing the history of the Iraq War in order to undermine it.
If you don’t stand up to fight this issue, the future of the Iraq war is at stakes.
I have long hoped Bush would someday lay out a lot about the Iraq war that has yet to come to light ..I dont know that it will happen however
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.