Weakness begets weakness. That's why we have to stand up to the thugs in the first place. It might "seem" more humanitarian and sensible to negotiate for hostages in each case, but every time we do, it leads to more incidents.
I wonder if this will make it to the mainstream media?
Chavez, disgusting slime.
We never negotiate for hostages.
“It might “seem” more humanitarian and sensible to negotiate for hostages in each case, but every time we do, it leads to more incidents.”
And that’s when the choice becomes, bottom-line...
WHO IS BETTER?
Who is better to leave alive? Who is worse and thus is not a great loss to be dead?
All this haranguing by liberals about “how many killed” is ultimately useless, as the real question is “how many GOOD GUYS killed?”
Whatever preserves more GOOD GUYS, that’s the choice.
If it means killing thousands of BAD guys, so what.
The sad thing is, liberals are faced with a tough question. They don’t like to think of us as good guys.