WHAT? Am I to understand that you do not recognize or advocate strong measures in the face of Radical Islam?
The same? Joined? Did we 'Join' Nazism when we went to war (Brutally, because there was limited and loyal news reporting) against Nazi Germany? Get a grip.
Islam is NOTHING MORE THAN A CULT> Pure and simple. Religions do not teach killing of others. Cults do. They SHOULD be burned out as a bed of snakes would be.
Just my $0.02
The most offensive aspect of radical Islam is its refusal to recognize freedom of speech or religion. The proposal I excerpted did exactly the same. Using your Nazi analogy, it would be like gassing a few million people of German descent to battle Hitler.
If you want to give up the fight to persuade people not to choose Islam by imposing your own religious and speech restrictions, you’ve lost your way. After Islam, what’s next? Liberalism? Atheism? Oh, you might not think so now, but just wait for the next rationalization for expanding prosecution of thought crimes. The only difference between Islamism and what that “amendment” would lead to is who started it.