I do not endorse this article. But rather very curious as to the reaction it provokes among US conservatives. What's your take?
I would tell Israel to get a real, war Prime Minister... not the jellyfish that's currently in office.
We can, and should, take such actions only when we have no further choices, and decide on our own that such actions are in our national interest. (My wager is that the world, and the UN, and the US will do nothing whatsoever to deal with Iran. Either intelligent, and younger Iranians will revolt and succeed, or Israel will bomb all nuclear targets. Either way, the US will say "We did nothing," and then applaud vigorously.)
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "The Are-You-Kidding Award for Cong. Conyers"
[The harsh reality is America has secured her Middle Eastern interests at the expense of Jewish blood and Israeli security.]
Who supplies the foreign aid that allows Israel to exist at all?
Not to be belligerent here, but the surly tone, wild claims and one-sided writing of this article surely earns the author a tinfoil hat.
If I'm not mistaken (and I'm not) the US takes a lot of crap from being Israel's biggest Cheerleader. OPEC sure would like us more if we were as the author suggests.
Based on our relationship with our uneasy allies in the ME, I'd hope that the author's views are way out on the fringe.