Skip to comments.
Is it time for a Wall party?
Posted on 04/10/2006 10:11:19 AM PDT by CompProgrammer
I was listening to Rush and thinking about our Washington politicians. Is it time for a third party, the "Wall" party? I don't have the experience, contacts, or skills to know where to start on this, but here is what I would run on.
- Nothing about abortion
- It's too divisive an issue and can be dealt with in the courts.
- Term Limits
- No one serves more than two terms, retroactive.
- Build the wall
- Like the caller on Rush said the other day, hire the Mexicans to build the wall. They have the biggest concrete block company in the world.
This is all I can think of in my currently angry state. Please embellish on this.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: aliens; borderfence; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; newparty; thirdparty; wall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: CompProgrammer
"Mr. Bush, put up this wall."
2
posted on
04/10/2006 10:11:48 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
To: CompProgrammer
No, it's not time to start a new party. Yet.
Enough members of the GOP still listen to their base on this issue to justify us still voting for the better pubbies. After all, Bush isn't running for re-election, but they are. They HAVE to listen to the base. Or get term-limited the old-fashioned way.
3
posted on
04/10/2006 10:13:33 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Tagline under contruction. Fines doubled.)
To: CompProgrammer
I'll bring the beer. You get the pizza.
4
posted on
04/10/2006 10:13:58 AM PDT
by
4U2OUI
(losing what I thought was sanity...and liking it.)
To: dfwgator
LOL! Good one. We should use it!
5
posted on
04/10/2006 10:14:30 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(There are good terrorists.............. DEAD ONES.)
To: CompProgrammer
I was thinking more in the line of a canal rather than a wall. Dig a canal from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific. The canal would be used for ship traffic in place of the Panama Canal and would look nicer than a wall. All the new waterfront property on our southern border would increase property value. Building tunnels beneath a canal would be impractical.
Yep! A 700 mile canal.
6
posted on
04/10/2006 10:19:45 AM PDT
by
Ben Mugged
(labor unions are socialism's shock troops)
To: dfwgator
If you build it, they won't come.
7
posted on
04/10/2006 10:20:03 AM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(I grew up in a slum, when I got to college it had become a "ghetto".)
To: dirtboy
"They HAVE to listen to the base. Or get term-limited the old-fashioned way."
It doesn't appear "they" believe this. If the RINO's get back in, "they" will have been proven right.
8
posted on
04/10/2006 10:22:37 AM PDT
by
Prokopton
To: CompProgrammer
How about a "Dark Side of the Moon" party?
9
posted on
04/10/2006 10:23:18 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Prokopton
It doesn't appear "they" believe this. If the RINO's get back in, "they" will have been proven right.Enough of the GOP House remains conservative to pass HR 4437. Enough of the Senate remains conservative enough to block amnesty. As long as that holds, support for the GOP should hold.
Accentuated, of course, by loud squawking should they get tempted to stray... :^)
10
posted on
04/10/2006 10:24:35 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Tagline under contruction. Fines doubled.)
To: CompProgrammer
I love talk about third parties. Such folly.
Look at the Libertarians, Constitution Party, Reform Party, American Heritage Party, John Birch Society, Lyndon LaRouche, and on and on...What do they all have in common?
Whiny crybabies that want to take their toys and go home. Losers. Spoilers.
We'd all be better served by staying put and fighting for conservative principles within the established two party system. Like that old ad copy says, "I'd rather FIGHT than switch." Still true today.
Flame on...chumps. Call me MR. ASBESTOS.
To: CompProgrammer
Well damn! I thought we were being attacked by aliens when I looked at the thread.
To: bigfootbob
No flame here. Had it not been for the misguided conservatives who voted for "Mr. Sucking Sound" in 1992, Bush 41 would have had a second term, and Clintoon would have been another democratic has-been former candidate.
13
posted on
04/10/2006 10:36:00 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: dfwgator
I recommend Tancredo to head up this part and then run as it's President nominee.
14
posted on
04/10/2006 10:49:20 AM PDT
by
p23185
(Being trashed by the Stone Age Press should be worn as a badge of honor by Repubs and Conservatives)
To: bigfootbob
How about the Republican party...newly formed in 1854 when a coalition of Independent Democrats, Free Soilers, and Conscience Whigs united in opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill
sometimes it takes a crisis to form a new party.
Jeeze TR almost got elected as a Bullmoose in 1912 and beat out the Republican and although a spoiler proved that it can and has been done.
15
posted on
04/10/2006 10:53:41 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: CompProgrammer
"Build the wall
Like the caller on Rush said the other day, hire the Mexicans to build the wall. They have the biggest concrete block company in the world."
If the Mexicans are hired to do this, they would have to be monitored every second. More than likely, they would build in flaws for their fellow wall-jumpers. I am still quite fond of the idea of a double-wall with a mine field in between...
To: bigfootbob
Why would the Republicans change when they know we're going to vote for them anyway?
17
posted on
04/10/2006 10:58:51 AM PDT
by
Ace of Spades
(Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: dirtboy
Enough members of the GOP still listen to their base on this issue to justify us still voting for the better pubbies. I don't see it. The Democrat-Lite Republican Senators in red states will continue to get reelected and nothing will change as long as they do.
Seriously, what motivation do they have to change if they still have the nunbers to win in a general election.
To: CompProgrammer
Nothing about abortion * It's too divisive an issue and can be dealt with in the courts.Agreed - if the GOP would go neutral on abortion they'd never lose another national election.
To: Yo-Yo
Bush senior got what he deserved:
George H. W. Bush had supported the ban of some semi-automatic rifles as well as other gun control efforts. In fact, since 1980, no Republican has won the highest office without the endorsement of the NRA.
case closed.
20
posted on
04/10/2006 11:01:52 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson