Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's WMD and terrorist connections all proven in one document!!!
Ray Robison Blog ^ | March 20, 2006 | Ray Robison

Posted on 03/21/2006 9:59:48 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Saddam's WMD and terrorist connections all proven in one document!!!

IZSP-2003-00003336

The Arabic original shows the Falcon emblem of the Iraq Intelligence Service. A translation is provided if you scroll down. I highlight the key wording but there is more:

March 11, 2003

The al-Quds liberation army division supplied us with information....as follows.

1. The Iraqi government will distribute the same leaflets that the American forces are distributing but it will contain anthrax.

2. Iraq imports uniforms resembling American forces uniforms for the purpose of killing Iraqi citizens....

3. Dig trenches around Baghdad...oil...burning...cause mayhem

Now this letter is from al-Quds, a Jihad organization that supports the Palestinians. Saddam was the patriarch and Iraq officers worked closely with them.

IZSP-2003-00000859  also talks about the al-Quds Basra division. This is a a letter from a paramilitary organization INSIDE Iraq and not from Palestinian territories. The al-Quds in Iraq are Palestinians who live in Iraq and also are involved in Palestinian activities.  They fought for Saddam because Saddam supported them in Palestine. The officers were Iraqi.

The al-Quds are covering their own butts by telling the IIS what they have been ordered to do or even trying to get them to stop Saddam since the war is immanent. If Saddam wanted to kill Iraqis with anthrax to make it look like the U.S. did it, it would be wise for him to use Palestinians instead of Iraqis. Therefor, it makes sense that he ordered the al-Quds to do it.

(Excerpt) Read more at rayrobison.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: alquds; anthrax; iraq; iraqdocs; iraqiintelligence; izsp200300000859; onfreep; palestinians; prewardocs; saddam; sawa; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: stockstrader

reminds me of the joke:


The Pope is visiting Washington, D.C., and President Bush takes him out for an afternoon on the Potomac, sailing on the Presidential yacht. They're admiring the sights when, all of a sudden, the Pope's hat (zucchetto) blows off his head and out into the water.

Secret Service guys start to launch a boat, but president Bush waves them off, saying, "Wait, wait. I'll take care of this. Don't worry." Bush then steps off the yacht onto the surface of the water and walks out to the Holy Father's little hat, bends over picks it up, then walks back to the yacht and climbs aboard. He hands the hat to the Pope amid stunned silence.

The next morning, the headlines in the New York Times, Boston Globe, Atlanta Constitution, Washington Post, Boston Herald, Buffalo News, Houston Chronicle, Milwaukee Sentinel-Journal, Minneapolis Tribune, Denver Post, Albuquerque Journal, Los Angeles Times and San Francisco Chronicle all proclaim: "Bush Can't Swim!"


81 posted on 03/29/2006 12:13:05 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget; jveritas
Is the meaning of Sawa

The issue....?

82 posted on 03/29/2006 12:15:46 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Yep...lol. And THAT 'news item' would be repeated AD NAUSEUM for weeks!!!


83 posted on 03/29/2006 12:16:36 PM PST by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

ROFL!!!


84 posted on 03/29/2006 12:17:04 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Ray stated: But in another discussion it came up that Sawa also means together and that this word is not necessarily restricted to referencing the radio station.

I like that jveritas errs on the side of caution. If the meaning is not 100% clear, do not pick the worst of all possible meanings. That is simply bias.


85 posted on 03/29/2006 12:17:51 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Update!

See above...many posts....start at #54!


86 posted on 03/29/2006 12:20:18 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No kidding?
You did it?

======= placemark




I had a 24 hour headache yesterday. I am not reading anything lengthy until I have my eyes examined on Friday.


87 posted on 03/29/2006 12:24:20 PM PST by onyx (Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Then save your eyes and just read the italic paragraph in the top post at http://iraqdocs.blogspot.com/

That is the same document as Ray Robison is referencing regarding anthrax.


88 posted on 03/29/2006 12:27:59 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Get you a POWERFUL computer....I recomment an AMD64 X2 3800+ at least.....and one of those fancy programs that converts documents to sound via your soundcard and speakers.....give your eyes a rest.


89 posted on 03/29/2006 12:33:41 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: All
I'm checking on the programs
90 posted on 03/29/2006 12:34:38 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
SAWA is the name of the radio station and it was wrongly translated as "impaired broadcast". SAWA in Arbic means "together". This is a Pro-US station in the Middle East that has been broadcasting before the Iraq war started.
91 posted on 03/29/2006 12:36:23 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

Thank you.


92 posted on 03/29/2006 12:37:24 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hadn't read the Hitchens article, but now that I have (thanks to your link), one portion leaps off of the page: Honorable as this role may be (referring to coalition forces as holding the factions at bay to prevent civil war), it is not enough in the long run. In Iraq we have made some good friends and some very, very bad enemies. (How can anyone, looking down the gun-barrel into the stone face of Zarqawi, say that fighting him is a "distraction" from fighting al Qaeda?) Over the medium term, if our apparent domestic demoralization continues ... Hitch has stated in an around about way the crux of the treasonous behavior by the democrap party and their leadership now doing all they can to undermine the war effort and thus the Bush administration in order to regain political control over America! The democrats are not only too facile (readily manifest and often too insincere) to be allowed back into control, they are downright seditious and treasonous and too damn dangerous to be allowed even dogcatcher status! The democrat party is al Qaeda's greatest asset in this terror war because the democrat party has as its primary goal the defeat of America's effort to win in Iraq and reduce terrorist Islam's empowerment in the Middle East ... to the democrap party, al Qaeda killing Americans and horrific civil war in Iraq is empowering! And they are showing that to be true at every obstruction and seditious turn.
93 posted on 03/29/2006 12:38:02 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; jveritas

comments@radiosawa.com

Wonder if it as simple as just asking them if they broadcast the anthrax alligations?


94 posted on 03/29/2006 12:38:41 PM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Sadly, it really doesn't matter what is found... or how accurate the translations are. The Pentagon and Negroponte have already said they can't vouch for the authenticity of the documents.


95 posted on 03/29/2006 12:40:33 PM PST by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Regarding WMDs and Iraq, please think about the following FACTS: when Saddam gassed the Kurds and Iranians he had WMDs and would never have used even 50% of such weaponry in those actions because he would reserve more for retaliations; tons of African yellow cake discovered in 2003 in Iraq were not there to refine power station radioactive materials; the Russians were doing all they could to aid and abet Saddam as a means to harm the U.S. and there are data showing Russian cargo movements out of Iraq just prior to our invasion of Saddam's country.


96 posted on 03/29/2006 12:43:00 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Line 1 in the original English translation attached to the original document reads as follow:

The Quds liberation army supplied us with information (open source) (impaired broadcast) as follow:

The right translation shall be:

The Missan division in the Al Quds army provided us with information (Public Sources) (Radio SAWA) that says the following:”

The first translation can lead to misinterpreting the whole document because it give a wrong impression of what is (impaired broadcast) thinking it is some type of Iraqi military broadcasting or signals where in reality it is a Pro-US Radio called SAWA.

97 posted on 03/29/2006 12:43:45 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Saddam had already allowed the Rusians to move the WMDs out of Iraq because their existence would have proven Russian complicity in Saddam's acquisition of same ... well beyond our own supplying him in the eighties.


98 posted on 03/29/2006 12:44:58 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Now he is not only doing translations of the documents ,,,,,he is correcting some of the translations done by others prior to his seeing them .

So now Jveritas has gone beyond original translation, beyond what the New York Times called 'second guessing' and he is now 'correcting' the government field translation. Let me guess, even the New York Times will complain about that somehow.

99 posted on 03/29/2006 1:24:53 PM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

You might have an interest in this:

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20030820-081256-6822r.htm

"The Soviet bloc not only sold Saddam its WMDs, but it showed them how to make them "disappear." Russia is still at it. Primakov was in Baghdad from December until a couple of days before the war, along with a team of Russian military experts led by two of Russia's topnotch "retired"generals: Vladislav Achalov, a former deputy defense minister, and Igor Maltsev, a former air defense chief of staff. They were all there receiving honorary medals from the Iraqi defense minister. They clearly were not there to give Saddam military advice for the upcoming war—Saddam's Katyusha launchers were of World War II vintage, and his T-72 tanks, BMP-1 fighting vehicles and MiG fighter planes were all obviously useless against America. 'I did not fly to Baghdad to drink coffee,' was what Gen. Achalov told the media afterward. They were there orchestrating Iraq's "Sarindar" plan."


100 posted on 03/29/2006 1:31:39 PM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson