To: Antoninus
"Or if one remains childless so they can buy a nicer car or live in a nicer neighborhood?
(Do you recall that NY Times article by a NY feminist who had two of her triplets aborted specifically so she wouldn't have to move to Hoboken and shop at Costco?)"
And you really see those two scenarios as moral equivalents????
To: linda_22003
To the Prude Squad, they are moral equivalents.
579 posted on
03/07/2006 10:26:14 AM PST by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
To: linda_22003
And you really see those two scenarios as moral equivalents????
No, not morally equivalent. However, they are sprung from exactly the same attitude--namely, that material goods are more important than having children.
584 posted on
03/07/2006 11:02:09 AM PST by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
To: linda_22003
And you really see those two scenarios as moral equivalents???? For someone who thinks that the birth of modern totalitarianism arose from "a denunciation of government", this barely counts as one of the six impossible things one is expected to believe before breakfast.
597 posted on
03/07/2006 12:36:46 PM PST by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson