Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus

"Or if one remains childless so they can buy a nicer car or live in a nicer neighborhood?

(Do you recall that NY Times article by a NY feminist who had two of her triplets aborted specifically so she wouldn't have to move to Hoboken and shop at Costco?)"

And you really see those two scenarios as moral equivalents????


548 posted on 03/07/2006 9:44:14 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies ]


To: linda_22003

To the Prude Squad, they are moral equivalents.


579 posted on 03/07/2006 10:26:14 AM PST by RockinRight (Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

To: linda_22003
And you really see those two scenarios as moral equivalents????

No, not morally equivalent. However, they are sprung from exactly the same attitude--namely, that material goods are more important than having children.
584 posted on 03/07/2006 11:02:09 AM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

To: linda_22003
And you really see those two scenarios as moral equivalents????

For someone who thinks that the birth of modern totalitarianism arose from "a denunciation of government", this barely counts as one of the six impossible things one is expected to believe before breakfast.

597 posted on 03/07/2006 12:36:46 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson