Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Looks like we've got 'em just where they want us...
1 posted on 10/03/2005 8:06:28 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pabianice

How are these different from the reactions here at FR?


2 posted on 10/03/2005 8:07:43 AM PDT by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Here's an out-there theory. I think that Bush might be provoking them into a filibuster of a "kamikaze" candidate, so that he can then nominate a judicial conservative and they will appear hypocritical if they vote that one down also.


3 posted on 10/03/2005 8:09:11 AM PDT by Betaille ("And if the stars burn out there's only fire to blame" -Duran Duran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Some of those quotes look like they came from THIS forum.


4 posted on 10/03/2005 8:09:41 AM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
"She is anti-choice, pro-police power, weak on individual liberties, pro-big-business, and is a stealth candidate with no record to scrutinize."

lol....well, if she has no record to scrutinize then how does this poster know so much about her?

5 posted on 10/03/2005 8:10:01 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The President is living up to his pledge to be a uniter.

Both sides are united against the Harriett Miers nomination to the Supreme Court.
8 posted on 10/03/2005 8:12:48 AM PDT by msnimje (Hurricane KATRINA - An Example of Nature's Enforcement of Eminent Domain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
. The religious right will bleat in feigned outrage as they set the stage that the woman is not right enough.

My outraged bleating is not feigned.

14 posted on 10/03/2005 8:14:00 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (We were promised someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold. Instead we got a Dem approved Bush crony. :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Well, seeing how the whackos are reacting makes me feel a lot better about this choice.


15 posted on 10/03/2005 8:14:09 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
"...because this is the critical swing seat on the Court, Americans will need to know a lot more about Mier's judicial philosophy and legal background before any vote for confirmation.'' - Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
I didn't know that there was a designated swing seat. Where do Democrats get this stuff?

Stingray: Conservative blog       

        <-------- Visit Stingray blogsite for conservative Christian commentary

16 posted on 10/03/2005 8:14:26 AM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Looks like we've got 'em just where they want us...

If by "we" you mean the white house instead of people who believe in conservatism, then you are probably correct.

18 posted on 10/03/2005 8:15:27 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

What do people expect, that the DUmmies will applaud anyone Bush could possibly nominate? David Souter himself was denounced as "anti-choice" and "pro-big business" right out of the gate.


21 posted on 10/03/2005 8:17:26 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

The ACLJ likes her.
http://www.aclj.org/News/Read.aspx?ld=1911


26 posted on 10/03/2005 8:21:23 AM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The Kennedy/Schumer wing of the party will be painted as nutty loons representative of the liberal fringe of American society.

As opposed to painting them as they really are: socialist goons bent on destroying American society?

28 posted on 10/03/2005 8:24:12 AM PDT by brbethke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

You ought to put together a list of comments by some freepers who are now link with the left on the selection of Meirs to be fair.

Frankly these comments you posted are similar to plenty I read here today on FR.


30 posted on 10/03/2005 8:27:04 AM PDT by alisasny (Liberal UTOPIA rains down in New Orleans Way to go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Mark my words, a female nominee will get a royal going-over - far beyond that of a male or minority nominee. Hope she's got a steel gut to endure what she's facing in the weeks ahead.


31 posted on 10/03/2005 8:28:20 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
She's an intellectual lightweight,

With an undergraduate degree in mathematics?

32 posted on 10/03/2005 8:31:04 AM PDT by eyespysomething (Historically accurate, not politically correct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

{The Supreme Court is going to have to rule on whether a sitting President can be indicted when there is no House Judiciary Committee willing to vote for impeachment. The Supreme Court is going to have to issue a raft of rulings on issues stemming from the Fitzgerald indictments, the DeLay case, the entire mess of worms on K Street and in the Congress. Bush is no longer thinking about his "legacy". He's thinking about remaining a free man. This choice tells us that they know that they are guilty and are facing very serious legal consequences. Miers may be all that can keep Bush out of jail, perhaps for treason.}

That paragraph made me laugh out loud.


33 posted on 10/03/2005 8:41:20 AM PDT by brothers4thID (Do you stand with us, or are you going to just stand in the way?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Bush mentioned her work with "Exodus Ministries" who "encourage(s) ex-offenders empower them to become self-sustaining, productive, Christ-centered members of society."

Another Souter!!!!!!!

I'm leaving the party and voting for Pat Buchanan. (/sarc)

35 posted on 10/03/2005 8:55:05 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The democrats want to pick the next court member even though they aren't in power.They will complain about any nominee who isn't a pro abortion Ruth Ginsberg clone.Maybe they should try winning an election so they could be in a position to pick the next member of the court.
36 posted on 10/03/2005 9:57:32 AM PDT by rdcorso (Cindy Sheehen,"The Death Of My Son Worked Out Really Great For Me".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
The Libertarian, MRM, and satyrical feminist caucuses are struggling too... See both Gonzman's SCOTUS posts for Monday, October 3, 2005:

Bush picks Harriet Miers for Supreme Court ?!?!

George "Judas" Bush appoints David Souter II

Gonzman's comments for Bush picks Harriet Miers for Supreme Court ?!?!

Gonzman's comments for George "Judas" Bush appoints David Souter II

38 posted on 10/03/2005 11:43:56 AM PDT by TerryGale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson