- If President Bush had purged the government of all Democrat holdovers, like Clinton did in purging all of the US Attorneys in the country, the press would have gone wild about Bush. Of course, the press actually went mild about Clinton for his purge.
Anyway, Bush and Rove made a calculated decision to allow some termites (excuse me, Democrats) to remain in the national woodwork. Joseph Wilson IV is one of the proofs that that was a bad choice.
John / Billybob
True.
But another difference should have been dispositive. The clinton purge wasn't simple housekeeping. It was one of three parts of a grand scheme.
Does any sentient being really believe that it wasn't hillary clinton--(hillary just happened to be an acquaintance of bouncer Craig Livingstone's mother)--who hired Craig Livingstone in the first place?
(We know hillary clinton hired Jamie Gorelick, the lynchpin in the filegate-clinton putsch- Gorelick Wall triple play, a scheme (see below) that would enable the clintons to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder. )
Missus clinton, with her fascistic mindset and methods, likely engineered the whole deal. Digging up dirt on her perceived enemies is standard operating procedure for the very paranoid, fascistically inclined missus clinton.
- by Mia T, 4.15.04
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP) -
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
thanx to Fixit for the audioOnce the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.
Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.
Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.
While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).
The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.
Further confirmation of the Wall-as-cover-for-clinton-corruption thesis:
- Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
- Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect.
The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.
-
Filegate and the clinton Putsch,
committed in tandem,
the product of a careful criminal calculus,
at once empowered clinton
and disemboweled his opponents.
clinton was now free to betray with abandon
not only our trust,
but the Constitution as well.The Common Man
Mia T
February, 1998
Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as-cover-for-international-clinton-crimes thesis.
Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
-
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
- If President Bush had purged the government of all Democrat holdovers, like Clinton did in purging all of the US Attorneys in the country, the press would have gone wild about Bush. Of course, the press actually went mild about Clinton for his purge.