1 posted on
06/24/2005 12:03:52 PM PDT by
sactodan
To: sactodan
I know all of Iraq is a combat zone, but what is the percentage of troops killed by IED's rather than in firefights etc?
Is there anything that can be done to protect the troops better from IED's?
2 posted on
06/24/2005 12:12:33 PM PDT by
garyhope
( com)
To: sactodan
For the sake of perspective my grandfather was wounded by a roadside bomb in Germany in 1947. That's two years after the war.
In this case as in that, the terrorists are solely responsible for the attacks.
3 posted on
06/24/2005 12:18:32 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: sactodan
Is that the actual headline? It's the dumbest damn question I've seen in a while. The Killers are responsible! Secondarily, those who give aid and comfort and support to our enemies through their words and deeds are responsible. Is it coincidence that the attacks have increased while the state of Gitmo discussion rages???
4 posted on
06/24/2005 12:20:36 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
To: sactodan
By giving hope to the insurgents, Durbin, Kennedy and Pelosi for example appear to be unwitting assistants to the insurgency.
Unwitting?
Hardly, American lives mean nothing in their quest to regain
POWER.
8 posted on
06/24/2005 12:27:31 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson