From time to time I am asked about my use of the Ulasewicz name when I refer to the Commodities Scam Queen. This has happened again this week, and I reply publicly for others who might have the same question.ML/NJAnthony Ulasewicz was known to many as the "Bag man of Watergate." He told the Ervin Committee tales of delivering bags of cash to the various providers of "Special Services" that apparently required in the machinations that eventually became known as "Watergate."
It seems to me that Hillary was assigned a similar task in the machinations that have come to be known as "Whitewater."
Shortly after the Dynamic Duo captured the White House I started a thread in another venue which I called, "Bill ... or Hillary?" It started off as follows:
Forget "To be or not to be," Bill or Hillary? THAT is the question!Implicit in this was the question of who was leading whom. When I posed the question, I really wasn't sure what I thought myself.Which one is more slimy? Which one is more deceitful? We NEED a yardstick. We need some way to quantify this.
I propose a new measure to be known as the Deceit Quotient, or DQ for short. Like the Richter scale, the DQ will be open-ended. ...
Since then I've developed the opinion that Hillary's entire persona is a fraud. I'm not sure what she has ever done or said that seems even remotely clever or smart. Bill, on the other hand, isn't called "Slick" for nothing. If he were dependent upon her for ideas or guidance, he never would have become Arkansas Attorney General, let alone President.
Hillary has been little more than this guy's bag lady. Does anyone really think the Commodities Scam money was being supplied as a "special fee" for some service Hillary was providing? Does anyone really think that Miss Smartest Woman in the World's meteoric rise at the Rose Law Firm would have occurred without her hubby's "coincidental" political successes? She's no more leading anyone here around by the nose than Tony Ulasewicz was the mastermind of the Watergate cover-up.
Hillary Rodham [Ulasewicz] Clinton almost certainly has the wherewithal to destroy Slick Willie Clinton but she cannot do so without destroying her own self too. SWC and his people know she will not do this and so hold the big trump. They are the ones doing the leading, telling HRUC to dress pretty in pink, to bake cookies, pander to children, or whatever. She may gripe in private, but when it's showtime she's the one doing the jumping.
Good Point...just make sure the MSM, isn't determining the "benchmarks" (reference points)...or they'll all be Republican (Conservative) 8^|