HAH! This gets better. Post 4 in this thread, courtesy of DUmmie "kineta". Is this goofy, or what?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=245x7595
kineta (288 posts) Sun May-22-05 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. ps
here is part of the reading (which i did on 11/10/04), and i posted on this forum back in november:
The 8 of swords in the 10th very much indicates foul play concerning the election it is a card representing interference. I also see it as an indication of the Bush administration eventually being caught, even people going to prison. Although Im not entirely sure if this will happen in time for Kerry to become president. The King of Cups in the 11th might represent Kerry, or someone else who is appointed after the 9 & 8 of swords plays out. I think the 9 of swords in the 9th indicates some very painful court cases perhaps with all the current media inattention, when the criminality of the Bush administration comes to light, in court, a lot of people may become very disillusioned and upset. It could even be the international court. Things might really crumble for them.
Economically, Im thinking that things wont be so bad. The 3 of pentacles in the 4th house leads me to believe that unemployment will stay pretty low and The Star in the 8th makes me think that even though there is talk of countries selling off US debt that this wont manifest. I am a little confused by the Page of Wands & Page of Swords in the 2nd and 6th respectively. What Im thinking this might mean is that the way people begin to frame the deficit and taxes will be in terms of young people and future generations: the birth tax as George Lakoff put it. I think this will be pushed in the news quite a bit.
I find the Ace of Cups in the 3rd interesting. On one hand I see this as very positive, the media kind of redeeming itself. But at the same time this was one of those instances where the image looked like something else the rider-waite deck shows a hand holding a cup with 5 streams flowing from it. I got the impression of one central agency disseminating information that flowed out in seemingly different streams, and almost sugar coating things. I think that both these interpretations might be possible.