Skip to comments.
DUmmie FUnnies 06-01-05 (Scamdy Post-Hospital Thread On DUmmieland DELETED By Skinner!!!)
DUmmie FUnnies ^
| June 1, 2005
| Andy Stephenson, DUmmies, and PJ-Comix
Posted on 06/01/2005 8:07:19 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 1,021-1,035 next last
To: Purrcival; beandog
Well, you know, beandog has said a couple of times on this thread, "I don't care if he went to have his head cut off."
So maybe he did.
To: Mr. Silverback; speed_addiction
Start answering your phone, "Second Amendment Compliance Center, how may I help you?"Naw, start answering it "Happy Acres, Institution for the Criminally Insane, How can I direct your call?"
622
posted on
06/01/2005 10:23:46 PM PDT
by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
To: repinwi
having the same number did come up. But the amounts and dates don't coincide with previous known dates and amounts.
623
posted on
06/01/2005 10:24:29 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
To: beandog
By the way Mr. Beandog is an attorney so maybe if I'm nice to him he'll keep us from going to the slammer. Of course, being nice to him would be tough and should earn me a medal. :)
That won't work! He'll probly be there before us.........LOL

624
posted on
06/01/2005 10:26:21 PM PDT
by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
To: CAluvdubya
I was just wondering if everyone was under the impression the 2 checks are suppose to be exact copies of one another? Because they aren't.
They were both typed separately. (Don't know if it means anything) Just thought I'd toss it out there. I would think a bank uses carbon copy, not typing the same document twice. Once on the check and one for a copy? Know what I mean?
625
posted on
06/01/2005 10:36:00 PM PDT
by
repinwi
To: repinwi
No, not copies of each other. I think they were trying to pass them off as two separate checks.
626
posted on
06/01/2005 10:40:53 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
To: repinwi
FYI, since none of those you posted seem to be here to answer, banks will have copies in triplicate. The original, the customer copy & the bank copy. The pre-printed parts will sometimes have different info on them (e.g., the customer copy will say "customer copy", the bank copy will say... well, you get the picture). And obviously the bank copy will likely have a watermark while the carbon copies below will not. So no, the original & the customer copy are not exactly copies. Funny, huh? Ask your own bank to take a let you take a look at their cashier's checks when you get a chance.
To: CAluvdubya
With the same check number - How funny!
628
posted on
06/01/2005 10:43:46 PM PDT
by
repinwi
To: I_like_good_things_too
This is funny.......Over at DU (lounge) they are doing their usual posting pictures of themselves. Now why in the world are these ladies, in these times, putting their image out there on the internet???
You can bet if one of those pictures ends up on FR though......squeals galore.
629
posted on
06/01/2005 10:47:27 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
To: I_like_good_things_too
I understand that. What I was questioning is the fact that the "typing" ie: spacing, letters, format, etc. are totally different. They are not the same. If they were copies, then for example, why are there more ****** (stars) on one check then the other? Why are one of the dates typed slightly higher than the other? There's more, but I think you know where I'm getting at.
630
posted on
06/01/2005 10:47:44 PM PDT
by
repinwi
To: CAluvdubya
Where? I looked at "introduce myself", no pictures there.
To: Purrcival
Actually I have no problem with the loosened restraints on language over there.
I tend to take the Patton philosophy when it comes to swearing and there are times that I would ahve like to cut into someome here that really deserves it with some good old fashioned 4 letter vocabulary but couldn't.
I try to be respectful to those that are to me and to those that deserve it there and here...but the Libs and the DUmmies that wander onto the reservation...I have no such compunction.
632
posted on
06/01/2005 10:50:28 PM PDT
by
txradioguy
(In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng Bn ...K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
To: repinwi
That's a GREAT point. I didn't notice that. No, there would be no explanation for that.
I get thrown off track by those that want to continue to go back to the two earlier checks that I previously PERSONALLY verified. Since I know I'm not a troll or a mole, I tend to get thrown off track by that. Back on track... for now :-)
To: I_like_good_things_too
In the lounge. They title it something like OK ladies, post a picture....or Time for another post your photo thread.
Their logic escapes me
634
posted on
06/01/2005 10:52:28 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
To: franksolich
So if the old lady is looking to find me, she'd better look at suspicious DUmmies with HIGH post counts.
Are ya nuts frank? Some reason you're letting 'em have this kind of info?
Baffled in Hideeho
635
posted on
06/01/2005 10:54:22 PM PDT
by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
To: I_like_good_things_too
Well, I just wanted it out there and now you can see what I'm talking about.
There are differences between the two checks. (Not just the check numbers being the same) I don't know what the scammers were trying to prove?
Now I bid you goodnight and pleasant dreams everyone.
636
posted on
06/01/2005 10:55:05 PM PDT
by
repinwi
To: beandog
They keep referring to you as a he and I hate everybody assuming we're all he's.
I'm to the point I think y'all are she's. Sounds good to me. I like bein' outnumbered by the fairer(that's not how you spell that is it?) sex........LOL
637
posted on
06/01/2005 11:01:59 PM PDT
by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
To: CAluvdubya
I just can't seem to find it. It seems a bit sexist, but if they're willing to play, oh well.
To: beandog
(The only time I was wrong was the time I thought I was wrong)
I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
639
posted on
06/01/2005 11:05:42 PM PDT
by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
To: I_like_good_things_too
the guys post pictures too. My point is it's not safe and they do it almost once a week.
640
posted on
06/01/2005 11:06:51 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620, 621-640, 641-660 ... 1,021-1,035 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson