CAIR is giving a new meaning to "neocon." I hope someone can tell me what book they are talking about. It sounds to me like a fairly accurate description of Mohammed (pbuh).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Nicholas Conradin
Hah! NR is a NEOCON mag??? Get serious.
2 posted on
03/17/2005 6:09:15 PM PST by
Endeavor
(GO ILLINI)
To: Nicholas Conradin
3 posted on
03/17/2005 6:12:41 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Does my American flag offend you? Dial 1-800-LEAVE THE USA!)
To: Nicholas Conradin; Irish_Thatcherite; Land_of_Lincoln_John; Chgogal
I'd say the book is probably being kind. CAIR advertises itself as a positive force for Muslim activism. I think it needs to direct its activism to Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries that don't grant equal rights or religious freedoms before it starts it typical Islamic, divisive tirade to divide society here. If they can't understand where the real problems in this world are they just need to all go home and face reality...like back to Wahabbi Saudi Arabia and those religious fascist.
4 posted on
03/17/2005 6:13:39 PM PST by
Cornpone
(Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Who Dares Wins)
To: Nicholas Conradin
CAIR = Whiny loons.
I can't believe anybody gives these boys the time of day anymore.
5 posted on
03/17/2005 6:13:48 PM PST by
tdewey10
(Get cracking!)
To: Nicholas Conradin
Can someone tell me what constitutes "Hate" speech?
Is it any alternative opinion of a protected group?
6 posted on
03/17/2005 6:15:37 PM PST by
dvldog03
("For the Glory of God, and the Glory of our Corps...")
To: Nicholas Conradin
cair is using the term "neo-con" as a substitute for their anti-semiticism.
7 posted on
03/17/2005 6:16:04 PM PST by
ken21
( today's luxury development. tomorrow's slum.)
To: Nicholas Conradin
cair@cair-net.org
Tell cair how you feel about them comparing a book of fiction (Protocols of the elders of Zion) and the true srory of mohammed's life.
8 posted on
03/17/2005 6:20:27 PM PST by
federal
To: Nicholas Conradin
I'd like to know what book the Religion of Pieces is up on arms about, too. I hope the NR doesn't apologize to the Sinn Fein arm of Islamonaziism.
9 posted on
03/17/2005 6:20:44 PM PST by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: Nicholas Conradin
'Islamophobic' ... probably in the same way as not wanting to take your kids to Disneyland on Gay Days makes you 'homophobic.'
12 posted on
03/17/2005 6:28:20 PM PST by
GenXFreedomFighter
(We smirked our way back to a second term!)
To: Nicholas Conradin
"Mohammed posed as the apostle of God…while his life is marked by innumerable marriages; and great licentiousness, deeds of rapine, warfare, conquests, unmerciful butcheries, all the time invoking God's holy name to sanction his evil deeds." Can a Muslim deny any part of this statement? It looks pretty accurate to me.
13 posted on
03/17/2005 6:28:28 PM PST by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: Nicholas Conradin
CAIR have their panties in a wad again? I'm shocked- SHOCKED!
15 posted on
03/17/2005 6:31:19 PM PST by
Fudd Fan
(MaryJo Kopechne needed an "exit strategy")
To: Nicholas Conradin
/Scratch head
So, these Muslims are shocked that Christians don't believe Muhammed? They do understand that being a Christian specifically involves disbelieving Islam...right?
16 posted on
03/17/2005 6:31:43 PM PST by
swilhelm73
(Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
To: Nicholas Conradin
I make it a point to always find something good in anything that offends CAIR or the terrorist Muslims.
Who cares how "offended" they are.
17 posted on
03/17/2005 6:33:46 PM PST by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Nicholas Conradin
"Mohammed couldn't possibly be a true prophet" "Mohammed posed as the apostle of God"
"His life is marked by innumerable marriages and great licentiousness, deeds of rapine, warfare, conquests, unmerciful butcheries, all the time invoking God's holy name to sanction his evil deeds."
"Mohammed again and again justified his rapine and licentiousness with new 'divine revelations."
Wow! I don't understand whats wrong.
The above statements are true to the best of my knowledge.
19 posted on
03/17/2005 6:38:41 PM PST by
DoctorMichael
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Nicholas Conradin
It quotes the author as claiming: "Mohammed posed as the apostle of God…while his life is marked by innumerable marriages; and great licentiousness, deeds of rapine, warfare, conquests, unmerciful butcheries, all the time invoking God's holy name to sanction his evil deeds." From what I have read, this is fairly accurate.
21 posted on
03/17/2005 6:44:10 PM PST by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: Nicholas Conradin
Not that it should suprise anyone on this forum, but, CAIR just doesn't get it when it comes to this nation's foundations: People are allowed to say bad things about islam here, just like the ACLU has been attacking Christianity for decades.
28 posted on
03/17/2005 7:13:38 PM PST by
No Longer Free State
(The last thing Reuters wants is a free and unfettered Iraqi press)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
31 posted on
03/18/2005 7:40:44 AM PST by
SJackson
(Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
To: Nicholas Conradin
I've read 15 different definitions for the phrase, "neocon," and I still don't get the Jewish connection.
I thought that it was neo=new, and con=conservative.
The new conservative politics of promoting our democracy around the world, and the unabashed use of force against tyrants and dictators to improve and ensure our world position in the new millennium, no matter what the other Nations thought.
Where the heck did "Jew" come into that?
41 posted on
03/18/2005 10:46:28 AM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Nicholas Conradin
Note to the Islamist org, CAIR:
Stop the Taqqiah.
1. The Protocols are lies. The quotes on Mohhamed come out of the Koran and Hadith.
2. National Review is Fusionist Conservative not neoconservative.
42 posted on
03/18/2005 11:24:20 AM PST by
rmlew
(Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
To: Nicholas Conradin
"Hooper said anti-Muslim rhetoric often leads to discrimination and even violence. "
And they put up the website where Muslims could self-report instances of bias to prove it.
48 posted on
03/21/2005 3:21:27 PM PST by
dervish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson