[Servant of the 9]

“Infants with this condition are usually stillborn or die shortly after birth from respiratory failure; however, some children have survived into childhood with a lot of medical help.”

In other words, the kid has been sentenced to death by God and the State has simply decided not to fight God's decision on the matter since they will inevitably lose.

So9

[writer33]

In other words, the kid has been sentenced to death by God and the State has simply decided not to fight God's decision on the matter since they will inevitably lose.

Yes, but doesn't the State have the ultimate authority over God?

Oh, wait a minute...nevermind. :)

Denote heavy sarcasm.

[Spiff]

In other words, the kid has been sentenced to death by God and the State has simply decided not to fight God's decision on the matter since they will inevitably lose.

One of my children had the umbilical cord wrapped tightly around his neck when he was born. Did God sentence him to die and was it wrong for the hospital to "keep him alive" by removing the cord from his neck?

Where do you draw the line?

[mlc9852]

Everyone is sentenced to death by God but this baby is still alive and the hospital has not legal right to terminate this baby's life. If you can tell me what legal theory allows a hospital to perform euthanasia on an infant, I would love to hear it.

[Mrs.Nooseman]

IMO,if God had sentenced this baby to death ,it would have died right after birth.God wanted this baby to live,that is why it didn't die right or shortly after birth.

BTW,what is wrong with that idiot judge?
I always thought that judges had to hear both sides before ruling,isn't that a law.