Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Nakatu X

It wouldn't be "invisible to detection". All one would have to do is run a basic test pass on the system (such as running ballots through - using controlled numbers of ballots, etc...) in order to detect "anomalies"...

It wouldn't be too hard to come up with some controlled tests to determine the accuracy of any given electronic voting machine... Even without the source code.

In fact, most testers I know never have access to the source code, and have to find anomalies, deviations, bugs etc... just by running the compiled code.

DUers are morons.


99 posted on 12/06/2004 5:20:35 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks ('Hate' is just a special kind of Love we give to people who suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Chad Fairbanks

Thanks for your input... you're right, no way the boxes didn't go through extensive testing, and would it also not be possible to decipher the compiled code?

That affidavit looked like it was written by someone who got through community college Visual Basic class but no more than that...


102 posted on 12/06/2004 5:48:05 PM PST by Nataku X (For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: Chad Fairbanks
DUers are morons...BUT YOU REPEAT YOURSELF!
113 posted on 12/06/2004 8:57:55 PM PST by luvie (WE DID NOT WAVER; WE DID NOT TIRE; WE DID NOT FALTER; AND WE DID NOT FAIL!! GWB ROCKS!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson