Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Free State project pro illegal drugs?
Today | Major Matt Mason

Posted on 09/09/2004 7:04:51 PM PDT by Brainhose

These Free-Staters that are trying to invade N.H. seem to be hiding behind a veil of the 2nd ammendment.
Do any other Freeper have any familiarity with this group?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: drugwar; freestatersdrugs; wod; wodlist

1 posted on 09/09/2004 7:04:52 PM PDT by Brainhose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brainhose

I know some Free Staters. They are probably pro-illegal drugs, but then again they would change the law so they wouldn't be illegal anymore...


2 posted on 09/09/2004 7:07:19 PM PDT by RetroSexual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose

Free Staters are for definitely for limited government. I don't know that they are for repeal of all drug laws. Maybe. But what's wrong with that? When this country started, there was no damned DEA or ATF. Why did we need those clowns now?


3 posted on 09/09/2004 7:18:48 PM PDT by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual
Very redundant statement :)
You don't seem to address the fact that they seem to be hiding behind a veil of the 2nd ammendment.
It seems obvious that they must be trustfund babies, who else could just up and move to New England from california for only one topic where the average house price is well over $300,000? Call me paranoid but is this tied at all to the George Soros campaign to legalize all drugs in Massachusetts a couple of years ago, including heroin?
4 posted on 09/09/2004 7:29:26 PM PDT by Brainhose (THINK OF THE KITTENS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose

My wife and I have talked about heading out there, we have family that lives on border with Maine so our people would be there. We both could likely find work there, and the frosting on the cake is there's supposedly all these libertarian types moving up there. If they can merely affect the tax policy and government expenditure end of things in the state government, then I suspect NH will become a very favorable economic environment. Both of us support various legalization or decriminalization policies for some drugs although I would probably vote to keep certain ones illegal. So we may be up there within the next 3 - 4 years.


5 posted on 09/09/2004 7:36:51 PM PDT by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose
Well, I don't suspect them of evil motives. The group has been organizing for several years, with the stated purpose of taking over the politics of one state, then reducing it's government. New Hampshire was not always the target state. Had they chosen Delaware, which was on the table at one point, I might have moved there myself.

The people I know have pure motives, however I won't deny that they could be "useful idiots".

6 posted on 09/09/2004 7:39:13 PM PDT by RetroSexual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual

Hmmm... Pardon me if I am wary of a group, any group who plans on "taking over" my state. It's bad enough we have all those "Massholes" moving up here, the last thing we need is another bunch of Liberal Democrat voters moving in here.


7 posted on 09/09/2004 10:15:45 PM PDT by Brainhose (THINK OF THE KITTENS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StockAyatollah

I'm an occasional pot smoker myself, but the last thing this country needs is legal Heroin and Cocaine, or even pot. Tell me what is good about Legal Coke and Heroin? It sure has done Amsterdam a world of good.


8 posted on 09/09/2004 10:23:59 PM PDT by Brainhose (THINK OF THE KITTENS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual
Still think about this for one second.... The NAZIS had the stated goal of taking over one state, then the world. Not that they are necessarily Nazis, but then again you do not live in the state that they are trying to take over.
I love how all the freestaters think we should all just bend over and accept it.
If they feel like "Liberating" a state why don't they choose Massachusetts?
That is a state that needs to be "Liberated"
They sound too much like the Anarchists that hang out on Boston Common. Are they also they funded by ANSWER?
Where is all the funding coming from?
9 posted on 09/09/2004 10:41:11 PM PDT by Brainhose (THINK OF THE KITTENS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: motexva

What do you mean by "Affecting the tax policy" you come from a state with an income tax and a 7% sales tax into a state which has neither. The Maine tax policy sucks, so if you mean to change my taxes to yours, please stay there. I don't need an Income tax or a 7% sales tax. How about lobbying your state to increase your taxes instead of mine.


10 posted on 09/09/2004 10:53:42 PM PDT by Brainhose (THINK OF THE KITTENS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose

The legalization of drugs is nice on paper, but not nice in real life.


11 posted on 09/10/2004 2:13:13 AM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose
Tell me what is good about Legal Coke and Heroin?

What's good about the laws against them? They've had no demonstrable effect in reducing drug use, but have had the effect of making drugs a high-profit business and putting those profits in criminal hands.

12 posted on 09/10/2004 10:33:50 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
The legalization of drugs is nice on paper, but not nice in real life.

The criminalization of drugs is even less nice (which is why we ended the criminalization of the drug alcohol).

13 posted on 09/10/2004 10:36:01 AM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose

By affecting the tax policy I mean having either further reforms to the tax code and reducing the size of state government more. Not raising taxes.


14 posted on 09/11/2004 7:41:36 PM PDT by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson