Skip to comments.
Scientists Vie To Break Junk DNA's Secret Code
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| Roger Highfield
Posted on 10/06/2003 4:34:06 PM PDT by blam
Scientists vie to break junk DNA's secret code
By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
(Filed: 06/10/2003)
Huge tracts of human DNA, previously written off as meaningless junk, have been found to contain a hitherto unrecognised "genetic grammar", making the language of our genes much more complex than previously thought.
The discovery is of potentially huge significance, since it could lead to an entirely new explanation for certain diseases and symptoms. A race is now on among teams of scientists worldwide to investigate this cryptic code.
While the genetic recipe of a human being is spelt out with three billion letters of DNA code, only about two per cent of these correspond to the genes - the DNA that describes the proteins that build and operate bodies.
In the latest issue of the journal Science, Prof Stylianos Antonarakis of the University of Geneva Medical School, Dr Ewen Kirkness of the Institute of Genomic Research, Maryland, and colleagues have reported compelling evidence that up to three per cent of our genetic material has a crucial role that is not understood.
They made the unexpected discovery that some DNA regions of humans, dogs and species as distant as elephant and wallaby are nearly identical. These regions of what were once called junk have been dubbed "conserved non-genic sequences", or CNGs, a reference to how they are not conventional genes.
Prof Antonarakis said: "I suspect that mutations in CNGs may contribute to numerous genetic disorders." Defects in CNGs could result in illness while the symptoms of Down's syndrome, caused by an extra copy of a chromosome, might be linked to the presence of additional CNGs.
"Many laboratories are now working on identifying pathogenic mutations," he said.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: crevolist; geneticgrammar; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; junkdna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 801-820 next last
To: Ogmios
Ogmios,
Answer the question. Are you the person who used the handle Aric2000 or not? Yes or No.
Truthful Regards,
Boiler Plate
To: Junior
Me too, that was very good.
202
posted on
10/08/2003 9:00:30 AM PDT
by
Ogmios
(Who is John Galt?)
To: Ogmios
Answer the question.
To: DittoJed2; VadeRetro
Your buddy Ogmios seems to be having an identity problem.
To: Ogmios
You are an "agnostic Christian" by your own
admission. Exactly the same as Aric.
205
posted on
10/08/2003 9:04:43 AM PDT
by
DittoJed2
(Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it,derived from our Maker- John Adams)
To: Junior
I find it interesting to witness "conservatives" engaging in textual deconstruction. Perhaps we are witnessing the birth of a hybrid species, a melding of French rationalism with Christian fundamentalism. Foucault's pandemonium.
206
posted on
10/08/2003 9:08:26 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: Ogmios
We are still waiting on your answer.
To: Boiler Plate
Is that the Jeopardy music I hear?
208
posted on
10/08/2003 9:13:09 AM PDT
by
DittoJed2
(Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it,derived from our Maker- John Adams)
To: DittoJed2
By the way, what dies the "2" in your screen name signify.
209
posted on
10/08/2003 9:14:17 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: js1138
I first came on Free Republic in 1998 as Dittojed. That screename is active, but haven't used it in years.
210
posted on
10/08/2003 9:16:24 AM PDT
by
DittoJed2
(Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it,derived from our Maker- John Adams)
To: DittoJed2
Why I believe it is. Guess what? His time is up!
To: Ogmios
Yoohoo, Oggy answer the question, yes or no?
To: DittoJed2
So you essentially have two screen names active at the same time?
213
posted on
10/08/2003 9:21:09 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: js1138
They haven't deleted the other screen name. I don't use it, nor have I in years.
214
posted on
10/08/2003 9:21:57 AM PDT
by
DittoJed2
(Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it,derived from our Maker- John Adams)
To: js1138
It wouldn't matter if they did. I think a while back I alerted them to that, but they never deleted it. You can see when I started using this name. It had been a while since I had last used the previous screename and I think I changed email addresses or something like that and forgot my password.
215
posted on
10/08/2003 9:23:19 AM PDT
by
DittoJed2
(Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it,derived from our Maker- John Adams)
To: js1138
Balrog001-666 placemarker.
216
posted on
10/08/2003 9:29:13 AM PDT
by
balrog666
(As long as people believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities.)
To: js1138
It is interesting, in that the very techniques they are using are the ones they decry when applied to Biblical texts...
217
posted on
10/08/2003 9:29:34 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: Junior
I don't decry methodologies when applied to biblical texts. I decry conclusions from those methodologies.
218
posted on
10/08/2003 9:30:56 AM PDT
by
DittoJed2
(Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it,derived from our Maker- John Adams)
To: DittoJed2
And your conclusions in regards to your deconstruction of a certain other poster are more valid how?
219
posted on
10/08/2003 9:34:55 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: Ogmios; DittoJed2
Oggy,
Well in spite of all your self righteous foot stomping about the horrific Holy Warriors and how they
"They lie, they connive, they misrepresent, and basically hurt whatever forum they happen to be on. I, in my moderator persona, warn them, when I find them on my boards, of 4 things: Lying will not be put up with, attacking posters for their religious or scientific convictions or beliefs will again not be tolerated, misrepresenting another posters views will be dealt with most harshly, and stalking a poster will be a banning offense. These are the symptoms of Holy Warrior disease, they are easily recognizable, and quickly seen."
It seems as though it is your deceit that is most easily seen here.
"I wonder what fun and mischief I will find when I get back."
As I have said before you never really knew anything about the subject you are just here to be disrupter hoping that someone else could bail you out when you got over your head.
So go ahead answer the question are you the same person who posted under the name of Aric2000 or not? Yes or no.
Honest Truly Regards,
Boiler Plate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 801-820 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson