[Maelstrom]

Let me try to show OTHERS your significant and irrefuteable errors

In 1992 this was the voter registration.....

Republican.....125,363 or roughly 60%
Democrat.....83,091, or 39.8%
Libertarian.....78.... not very many, poor fellows


Now..... the voting breakdown in the Presidential election was as follows.....

GHW Bush......39.6%
Clinton.......34%
Perot......25.6%

That means that if the percentages hold even roughly, Perot took less than 6% of the Democrat vote away, and nearly 20% away from Bush.

No, that means nearly 20% of conservative voters didn't vote for Bush. IT NEVER MEANS THAT A SINGLE ONE OF THEM WOULD HAVE CHOSEN BUSH FOR PRESIDENT IF PEROT WERE NOT AVAILABLE

When there are no conservative candidates, conservatives stay home in droves. It's a lesson you should have learned after Pete Wilson's defeat...after GHB's defeat...after Ford's loss. You should also realize that when there is a conservative candidate, nothing approaching "pure" mind you, that conservatives come out to vote in massive %'s as well.

[ohioWfan]

When there are no conservative candidates, conservatives stay home in droves.

Exactly. Which is where you and I will forever disagree.

I think it's stupid, unAmerican and hurts the country, and you think it's a swell idea.

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

When there are no conservative candidates, conservatives stay home in droves.

You call 'real conservatives'... ' Real Americans'.

Real Americans vote. Real Americans don't sit home and pout that things can't be 100% their way. Your 'real conservatives' need to grow up and stop acting like big babies.