Skip to comments.
Pheobe Debates The Theory of Evolution
Original scene from the show... Friends. ^
| NA
| NA
Posted on 07/24/2003 1:55:39 PM PDT by Mr.Atos
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860, 861-880, 881-900 ... 2,721-2,723 next last
To: Physicist
*gasp* (we agree...now I know how RWP feels
)
I find that link just as disgusting as you do.
To: Physicist
IHS = Isis, Horus, and Seth, the gods of Egypt!
Yes! It's obvious now that Jack Chick points it out. (Of course, he seems to have forgotten Osiris, Amon Re, Bastet, Nut, Sobek, Aten, Tehuti, and a few dozen others.)
To: Right Wing Professor
I did like the 'check this box for eternal life' bit at the end, though.Feh. I got "JavaScript Error: myImmortalSoul.rapture() method undefined". Time to update my browser.
To: Right Wing Professor
I can't believe there are people still writing this stuff. It's so Thirty Years War. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Whew!
To: VadeRetro
It's too tempting:
The great god Ra whose shrine once covered acres
Is filler now for crossword-puzzle makers.
- Keith Preston (1884-1927)
865
posted on
07/29/2003 9:11:21 AM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: VadeRetro
As far as I know few Christians see "visions" when they take communion. The only one that comes to my mind is St. Theresa.
Communion and baptism are the only sacraments that Christians hold in common, and we can't all agree on exactly what they mean, it's true.
I can't speak for others but Catholics don't "munch the wafer", we don't touch it with out teeth, we let it dissolve on the roof of our mouths.
So, to Catholics, "munch the wafer" is rude.
866
posted on
07/29/2003 9:11:58 AM PDT
by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
To: bondserv
bible literalists = people who believe what the Bible says is true as opposed to fiction. Bible literalist = people who believe a literal rather than allegorical interpretation of some Scripture is correct despite the physical evidence to the contrary. It has nothing at all to do with the Bible being true or not.
I honestly despair of certain folks ever discerning nuance. Am I the only person who was ever taught critical reading and thinking in school?
867
posted on
07/29/2003 9:11:59 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: whattajoke
This childish crap is hardly worth my time or efforts anymore. I'm quite comfortable with my posts, and I'm secure in the knowledge that genesis is an old story written by men who had no knowledge of modern science. Well, from one ranter to another, that was quite a rant. I would just point out that Genesis is not a science book, it's a history book and a book that reveals the character and identity of the Creator of time itself. The writer of Genesis did not write about science.
To: Right Wing Professor
"I did like the 'check this box for eternal life' bit at the end..."
It's part of the new Dispensation, usually accompanied by a 'check in the mail'.
To: conservababeJen
I find that link just as disgusting as you do.A point in your favor. I suspect, however, that certain posters here would believe it to be right on the money (and well-written, too).
To: Lurking Libertarian; Right Wing Professor
I would agree that posts that claim either than 'naturalism leads to (insert pet evil here)' or 'Christianity leads to (insert pet evil here)' might be ended by mutual agreement.I think unilateral disarmament is called for her also.
Look, those of us who accept a naturalistic approach to truth finding are never going to agree to accept miracles as an explanation for everyday phenomena. That's a given. But there are debate tactics that are equivalent to shooting one's own foot, and attacking the character of opponents is one of those tactics. My foot is pretty sore. I think I'll stop for a while.
This is not an agreement. It is just a promise to myself. Like going on a diet. ;^)
871
posted on
07/29/2003 9:15:14 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: RadioAstronomer
If I call Genesis a silly superstition, is that abuse in your eyes? It's not "abuse" to me, but it's unnecessarily rude.
I trust that you would not tell anybody to their face that their religion is a "silly superstition," regardless of your heartfelt beliefs.
872
posted on
07/29/2003 9:15:25 AM PDT
by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
To: Physicist
That is horrifically offensive. Of course, we'll never see any of the creos on this thread distance himself from ol' Jack Chick, will we? That screed reflects the bigotry to which I was subjected growing up.
873
posted on
07/29/2003 9:17:10 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: CobaltBlue
So, to Catholics, "munch the wafer" is rude. I probably did munch about one a year as a kid, a Methodist-in-training per my Dad's hopes. Nobody told me about that "let it dissolve" thing.
The tiny plastic vial of liquid was just grape juice.
To: Junior; conservababeJen
Of course, we'll never see any of the creos on this thread distance himself from ol' Jack Chick, will we?We've already seen one express her disgust for it.
To: conservababeJen
You surprise me here, c-J. I see you're a bit stunned, yourself.
While you're still stunned, one thing I do on these threads is voice my opposition to letting the Jack Chicks into science class.
To: Junior
Tunnel-vision is unnecessary, IMO.
Personally, I don't mind being "lumped" with anybody that I agree with more often than not. My guess is that Catholics agree with fundamentalists more than 50% of the time. For example, the fundamentalist position on abortion is far closer to the Catholic position than that of other Protestants.
If you take Vatican II seriously, I don't see the problem. We're supposed to be working together to the extent that we can, and disagreeing respectfully to the rest.
877
posted on
07/29/2003 9:21:59 AM PDT
by
CobaltBlue
(Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
To: Physicist
Actually it is well written. That's what makes it disgusting as opposed to merely silly.
878
posted on
07/29/2003 9:22:29 AM PDT
by
js1138
To: VadeRetro
For the record, this youthful Presbyterian (a compromise b/w my Methodist mother and baptist father) was weaned on stale Wonder bread cubes and grape juice as well. passed around the pews and inserted by our own hand--but only AFTER getting confirmed, which I was.
Aside: at a friend's catholic wedding some years ago, a jewish friend in our pew way too loudly stated, "do we get to eat a cracker? I'm hungry." To this day, he is chided for his insensitivity amongst friends.
To: Lurking Libertarian
Mea maxima culpa.
880
posted on
07/29/2003 9:28:11 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860, 861-880, 881-900 ... 2,721-2,723 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson