Now what is that supposed to mean...? That even though I'm a Christian I have no right to my beliefs? Or are you afraid that I will give evolutionists more cannon fodder?
I am a born-again Christian and I also happen to be a scientist. I know that God created the Universe and all that is in it, we differ only in our opinion as to HOW He made it. The evidence thus far points to a very long history, but frankly, I don't care how He did it. What matters to me is that He did, and in the process He created this wonderful world we live in.
What "Preponderance of Evidence" would you be alluding to? The fact that there are no transitional species? The fact that nearly 100% of all mutations are detrimental? The effects of entropy?
You make a outrageous claim like that and then go on a tear of all those who differ with you.
You make some pretty huge assumptions on what this Professor knows or doesn't know about science and scientific method. A person you know nothing about but what you read in the article and the bias it contains. Still you have no problem calling for her head and besmerching anyone else who might also know that evolution is a nowhere near being a fact.
Still being as learned as you are about evolution then you are aware of Ernst Mayr's statement that
"evolution is a historical science" for which "laws and experiments are inappropriate techniqes" to explain it.
Sounds like religion to me, but for the countless fools who adhere to it, opposition to evolution is heresy of the highest order.
I do like how you bridge the begining of life problem by giving God the credit for that, but then you toss out the rest of the Bible you claim to believe. Nice try, but let's see how scientific you are. Please let us in on the mountains of evidence for the evolution of flight. Remember use your own words and be specific.
Good luck and God bless.
Respectful Regards
Boiler Plate