Science is the study of how things work when there is no supernatural action.
Inteligent design might even be correct, but it can never be science. Call it theology, that's what it is.
So9
Evolution can never be science. Call it atheology, that's what it is.
Actually, this is incorrect. If there were "supernatural" monkeying with with the world, science would be able to detect it by observation, and would be able to determine many things about the times and manners in which such supernatural exceptions to "everyday" laws occurred. It would, in a sense, be able to learn quite a bit about such "supernatural" occurrences.
Contrary to popular belief, science does not presuppose non-supernatural causes for everything. That would, indeed, not be scientific. It just looks that way sometimes because so far, there's no clear evidence that anything "supernatural" is taking place or has taken place. Observations are so far consistent with "ordinary" causes and effects. At this point an extraordinary hypothesis like "it appears a miracle has occurred" would require either extraordinary evidence, or a large accumulation of smaller evidence.
But there would be nothing unscientific about concluding that supernatural forces were at work if that's what the evidence indicated.
I dare say that evolution has some tremendous obstacles to overcome to be considered science yet the preisthood of evolution consider it heresy to even allow to be criticized in their most holy temples (aka the public schools). It is little different than any other religion, especially when its adherents try to defend it. Evolution is a far cry from being solid fact and should be roundly critiqued at ever level. It is at best just a toy idea that can used as model to demonstrate how fact and theory should treated in a scientific setting.
Regards,
Boiler Plate
I think the point being made is that evolution is inaccurately being portrayed as a complete and comprehensive explanation as to the diversity of life.