Wow, you *really* need to lay off those drugs.
But just for giggles, please do attempt to document this amazing claim. And while you're at it, take a stab at all the other several dozen challenges for you to support your silly pronouncments as listed in the FABNAQ (Gore3000's Frequently Asked But Never Answered Questions).
and even nowadays you can read arguments from moronic evolutionists saying that it is not true in all cases.
Because it's not. Lateral transfer, for example, is one of the several ways that genetic information can be passed without Mendelian genetics. I would accuse you of ignorance, but the inflammatory nature of your post along with your past posting history points more towards an indication that you're just trolling again.
Evolutionists also delayed the greatest discovery since DNA, that genes are merely factories, and are tightly controlled by DNA elsewhere in the genome to make it do what needs to be done.
AHAHAHAHAHA!!! Document *that* bit of trolling too, if you don't want it added to the rest of your FABNAQ. (The part about evolutionists delaying it, I mean.)
If genes had no control, no connection to the rest of the genome, to the rest of the organism as moronic evolutionist theory has long postulated,
Yet another silly thing for you to document, or retract. You're really piling up quite a list of spewed falsities, G3K.
then the complex related processes of our bodies would be going in totally different directions and completely kill us.
That's so ridiculous I'm not even going to bother asking you to try to support it.
What science has discovered IN SPITE OF evolution, is that organisms are tightly controlled SYSTEMS which cannot be randomly changed without deleterious consequences.
You're deluded. Or trolling. I don't much care which. In truth, being "tightly controlled systems" increases, not decreases the ability of random changes to cause profound results, because it allows mutations to make systemic changes that bring about large-scale alterations in the organism (instead of microscopic differences that hardly matter), while the existing control mechanisms mediate the change into something that fits with the rest of the system. There's been a lot of research on this topic, G3K, are you 40 years behind on your reading?
Only the un-scientists of evolution would have proposed such a self-centered, nonsensical proposition as that 95% of human DNA had absolutely no purpose at all
The really funny part is that the *one* item on the FABNAQ which Gore3000 has *ever* tried to support was this one, and the scientific citations HE HIMSELF provided ACTUALLY SUPPORTED THIS RESULT that Gore3000 calls "nonsense".
This was pointed out to him, but true to form, Gore3000 is back again acting as if nothing had ever happened. A closed mind gathers no thought.
and that it was there just to show us that evolution is true.
G3K keeps making this goofy (oh hell, let's be honest and call it "stupid") claim that somewhere some evolutionist has said that non-coding DNA "was put there to show evolution is true", but needless to say he's just making a donkey of himself. It's in his FABNAQ, by the way, and he has made no attempt to support his claim. Not only has no evolutionst said such a silly thing, but such a claim would obviously *contradict* an evolutionary belief that DNA has arisen naturally and no one "put" anything in the DNA in order to "make" any point. Gore3000 can't even keep his own goofy stuff interally consistent.
Not only is such a view moronic and unscientific,
Yup, sure is -- but you're the only one claiming it.
but it also shows the lack of respect that evolutionists have towards those who they push their drivel on.
On the contrary, it shows Gore3000's contempt for his readers.
Wow, you *really* need to lay off those drugs.
But just for giggles, please do attempt to document this amazing claim.
The CHARLATAN Darwin said that traits are combined from mother to father. That the features 'meld' in the progeny. This shows quite well that the man was no scientist. In fact, I am sure he was led to this view due to his racism since the racial traits do seem to meld in progeny but this is due to these traits arising from different genes, not from 'melding'. It took evolutionists some three decades to figure out a way to reconstruct Darwinism to account for Mendel's genetics. This however was not quite successful and just dug a deep hole for them when DNA was discovered.
and even nowadays you can read arguments from moronic evolutionists saying that it is not true in all cases.-me-
Because it's not. Lateral transfer, for example, is one of the several ways that genetic information can be passed without Mendelian genetics.
Thanks for proving my point for me. Moronic evolutionists still deny the truth of Mendelian genetics.