[atlaw]

Just out of curiosity, what would the curriculum in a Creation Science class consist of?

[realpatriot71]

I don't think the folks in Ohio wanted a "creation science class" nor did they want creation taught in biology class per se, but rather wanted a disclaimer placed in the textbooks that stated that evolution was only a theory, and not necessarily scientifically established fact.

[MineralMan]

"Just out of curiosity, what would the curriculum in a Creation Science class consist of?
"

First two chapters of Genesis. That's it. Memorize 'em and you get an "A".

[mg39]

"Just out of curiosity, what would the curriculum in a Creation Science class consist of?"

It would consist of a textbook entitled, "1001 creation myths from 1001 one-and-only-true-religions throughout the world."

[Dataman]

Hey Atlaw

From the article. it is obvious the evolution-only advocates feel their ideology and livelihood are being threatened.

Just out of curiosity, what would the curriculum in a Creation Science class consist of?

If you haven't got a clue, you are ignorant of the opposition's position. Subject-changing questions are a poor substitute for homework.

[jimt]

Just out of curiosity, what would the curriculum in a Creation Science class consist of?

"God said it, I believe it, and that settles it. Repeat this five hundred times daily."

[Remedy]

Body by Design - Biology Curriculum, Anatomy, Physiology

[Steel and Fire and Stone]

It would be just about what I had in a private Christian school in the 70's, i.e. full, complete instruction on where the SCIENCE is, including evolution as well as science that supports a Creationist point of view. Either viewpoint requires faith. Darwinism is not reproducible science. Darwin may claim to be consistent with Scientific fact, but it is not based on reproducible Science. Creationists can make the same claim.

My college science classes required an evolutionary viewpoint to attain a passing grade, period. You couldn't introduce other faith-based view points, based on science, if they differed from Darwinist dogma. You couldn't ask a question that pre-supposed a Creationist world view.

No Creationist wants to eliminate free and open discourse. No Creationist wants to prevent introduction of Scientific evidence on the origins of the Universe and man, even if they disagree with the theories offered with that evidence. We'd just like to have the same "1st Ammendment" rights that the rest of the Scientific world has. However, Darwinists can't tolerate dissent, because much of their "science" rests upon a foundation of half-truths, misinterpretations, and lies.

[Boiler Plate]

Just out of curiosity, what would the curriculum in a Creation Science class consist of?

Reality based science.

[Jael]

Dr. Hovind has a great creation curriculum.

[Gargantua]

"Just out of curiosity, what would the curriculum in a Creation Science class consist of?"

The Truth, as spoken from the Mouth of Almighty God. The one true God in whom we (Americans) "trust." The Almighty Creator who bestowed upon us the individual rights enumerated in our Founding Fathers' documents, the Bill of Rights, and the United States Constitution.

Why do you ask?

;-/