[atlaw]

I followed your link, and under the heading "GOOD SCIENCE: A K-6 PLAN FOR EXCELLENCE" I found the following:

"The aims and objectives of "Good Science" curricula are designed to: a) develop the necessary skills in the critical thought and decision-makin,process [sic], as well as the process skills of scientific inquiry; b) develop activity-oriented materials that are cost effective for all home school and Christian school classrooms; c) develop activities that are challenging at the higher levels of learning taxonomy, as well as being intellectually exciting; d) develop a science curriculum that is interdisciplinary in nature; e) develop a clear creation-centered approach that expresses God as the Creator and Master Designer of all things. Man is always man; dog is always dog; frog is always frog; and plants and animals always reproduce fter [sic] their kind. In all activities, the Creator is given redit [sic] for the order and design that is bserved [sic] in the world around us. This scope-and-sequence" illustration for "Good Science—Under the Attributes ot [sic] God" provides evidence of God's creation in both the physical and life sciences."

This curriculum seems kind of thin (what is a "kind" after all), and it clearly preaches the Chrisitan perspective. Do you think this should be the curriculum in a public school science class?

[f.Christian]

Evolution is the absence of science (( design -- Law )) // philosophy // reality // SANITY--- brains and common sense too !

[Ichneumon]

; e) develop a clear creation-centered approach that expresses God as the Creator and Master Designer of all things. Man is always man; dog is always dog; frog is always frog; and plants and animals always reproduce fter [sic] their kind.

Right... "dog is always dog". Well, I guess if you ignore the fact that they *used* to be wolves...