Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 02/19/2003 10:13:53 PM PST by Jim Robinson, reason:

Flamewar



Skip to comments.

Who's with President Bush?
townhall ^ | February 18, 2003 | Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

Posted on 02/17/2003 9:27:11 PM PST by TLBSHOW

Who's with President Bush?

President Bush has characterized the choice to be made in this war on terror: "Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists." The stark clarity of this binary decision has served the United States well in marshaling a large number of nations in the fight against al Qaeda and a smaller, but still ample, number for the next phase of this war: the liberation of Iraq.

Regrettably, in the months since September 11, 2001, people who have made no secret of their sympathy for terrorists, provided them financial support, excused their murderous attacks and/or sought to impede the prosecution of the war against them have repeatedly been put in the company of the President. In other words, individuals and organizations who appear to be "with the terrorists" have time and again been allowed to be with the President in the White House and elsewhere.

For example: o On September 20, 2001 -- just nine days after the deadly attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon -- Shaykh Hamza Yusuf was the Muslim representative in a small ecumenical gathering held in the Oval Office.

At the same time, FBI agents were trying to interview him at his house in California since he had declared two days before the attack: "This country is facing a terrible fate....This country stands condemned. It stands condemned like Europe stood condemned because of what it did -- and lest people forget that Europe suffered two world wars after conquering the Muslim lands." His wife told the incredulous agents Yusuf wasn't home, he was with the President. o Six days later, President Bush met in the Roosevelt Room with a Muslim imam by the name of Muzammil H. Siddiqi. Siddiqi is a long-time board member of several organizations in the United States funded by, and closely tied to, Saudi Arabia's radical state religion known as Wahhabism. Two of these groups, including one where Siddiqi still sits on the board, were raided in March 2002 by Federal authorities in pursuit of terrorist financing.

This presidential meeting was all the more puzzling since the imam had shown his true colors by claiming, at a rally the previous October: "America has to learn...If you remain on the side of injustice, the wrath of God will come.

Please, all Americans. Do you remember that? Allah is watching everyone. God is watching everyone. If you continue doing injustice, and tolerate injustice, the wrath of God will come." o On September 17, 2001, President Bush paid a visit to the mosque in Washington. There he was photographed flanked by Nihad Awad, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

CAIR has long been an admirer and public defender of terrorist organizations whose attacks against even innocent women and children it sees as legitimate acts of "liberation." Awad has personally declared, "I am a supporter of the Hamas movement." o Also in the picture with President Bush at the mosque was Khaled Saffuri, currently chairman of an organization called the Islamic Institute, which he co-founded with conservative activist Grover Norquist.

Saffuri previously served as the development director of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, a supporter of the Palestine Liberation Organization when it made no bones about using terrorism for political purposes. He went on to become deputy director of the radical American Muslim Council (AMC), under then-director Abduraman Alamoudi -- a publicly declared supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, whose statements of solidarity with these groups prompted the Bush 2000 campaign to return his contributions. Under Saffuri's leadership, the Islamic Institute has attacked the Bush Administration's investigations of radical Muslim groups and closures of organizations suspected of funding terrorists.

The Institute has been funded by groups raided in the above-mentioned terrorist financing investigations. It lobbied intensively against portions of the USA Patriot Act. And Saffuri has personally denounced the President's listing of the Holy Land Foundation as a charity that supported terrorist organizations. He has acknowledged sponsoring the children of suicide bombers through the Foundation, even after its closure by the government.

In addition to the President, a number of his senior subordinates -- including Cabinet officers -- have met, in some cases more than once, with members of the aforementioned and other organizations with troubling attitudes towards jihadist terrorists. A particularly bizarre instance was FBI Director Robert Mueller’s keynote address last year to the American Muslim Council.

The AMC has a long record of activities hostile to the Bush Administration’s prosecution of the war on terror. It has even urged Muslims not to cooperate with the FBI! Nonetheless, according to a press release dated last Thursday, Mr. Mueller has invited the AMC’s chairman, Dr. Yahya Mossa Basha, to attend an upcoming meeting with him and “leaders of major Muslim and Arab-American organizations.”

It is very much in the President's interest -- and the Nation's -- that moderate, law-abiding, peace-loving and patriotic American Muslims be embraced and empowered by the Bush Administration and all those who support it in waging a war on terror, not on Islam.

To do so, however, the Administration must not allow those who are “with” its enemies in that struggle to continue being with the President and his team.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; michaeldobbs; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,361-1,369 next last
To: ohioWfan
Excepting a homosexual as a sinner and not hating him is ALLOT different than placing a homosexual in a place of power.

Would Jesus promote a homosexual (not an ex-homo a current homo) into the leadership of his ministry?

President Bush is a sinner, you need to accept that.
341 posted on 02/19/2003 3:58:48 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (Extremism in the Pursuit of Liberty is no Vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I had stopped posting on the thread and I had wanted more information on this subject. I did not bump it today someone else did.

Are you under the impression that threads don't get looked at unless YOU are bumping them?

Sorry you want to slam me when I thought it was a story that needed more looking into.

And in case you don't know this either, threads don't get PAUSED while you go look for more information to back up your salacious claims.

And you still have now claimed your own words on this thread, just keep trying to DIVERT the attention to the thread.

You either meant them or you were faking. Which is it?

342 posted on 02/19/2003 3:59:29 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What part of "Not yet" did you not understand

Translation in case you need one is .. No you did not say he was the anti- christ

But you have said other things .. for which we are STILL waiting for an explaination .. what exactly did you mean Todd .. care to answer the question?

343 posted on 02/19/2003 4:00:16 PM PST by Mo1 (DC Chapter .. Patriots Rally for America IV .. on Saturday, March 1st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Oh......you are a bad, bad person. Seriously. You posted your implications re President Bush for all to see.....and now when the owner of this site disagrees with you--and it was obvious he had read your words too, because HE told you Bush was not a traitor and your implications and inferences were out of line.....you are in a total CYA mode.

My 7 year old grandson has more integrity and personal values (to recognize and take responsibility for his own actions) then you do. Good grief.

And for the record.....I did not end up reading this thread as a result of a ping from ANYONE....no matter HOW hard you try and blame your own actions on someone else (Howlin). Not only do you NOT take responsibility for your own actions but you NOW cast around for someone else to blame?

Abso-friggin-lutely pathetic!
344 posted on 02/19/2003 4:00:19 PM PST by justshe (Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor. Only YOU can prevent Freepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I'd like you to answer my question in #327. What did you mean by what YOU posted?

It is clear to me you were accusing President Bush of selling out the country and then you turned around and denied doing it.

We're waiting...

345 posted on 02/19/2003 4:00:53 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Amazing.
346 posted on 02/19/2003 4:02:07 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
Cyber, hate to break it to you BUT WE ALL ARE SINNERS.
347 posted on 02/19/2003 4:02:43 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I had stopped posting on the thread

So?

The rest of us want to discuss your motive for posting in the way that you did and then your denials that followed, once you were called to account for your actions.

348 posted on 02/19/2003 4:03:00 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Get in line......we are 3 now, waiting for answers.
349 posted on 02/19/2003 4:04:41 PM PST by justshe (Eliminate Freepathons! Become a monthly donor. Only YOU can prevent Freepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
President Bush is a sinner, you need to accept that.

According to the Bible, "ALL have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God."

Even you.

350 posted on 02/19/2003 4:05:11 PM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I am done posting on this thread until I have more information if you want to talk about the thread subject or want to ask Sabertooth what he meant be my guest but I will instead as I said, I want more information on this subject that Frank wrote of before I say anything more. What I already posted early on is what I posted and found at that time from links from Sabertooth's posts or my own google. I said I was sad about it all and I am. We should not be back dooring with these kinds of people and why is what Frank is asking and I am asking.
351 posted on 02/19/2003 4:06:46 PM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
As I am reading this thread I can see a bunch of Freepers bashing two guys. I have not seen anyone provide evidence that they are lying.

I see them being demonized and lied about, but no proof of any of the accusations.

BTW- Neither said they Hate you, Muslims or Bush. Please backup your statements that they do.
352 posted on 02/19/2003 4:07:14 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (Extremism in the Pursuit of Liberty is no Vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: justshe
PlaceHolder
353 posted on 02/19/2003 4:07:27 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: justshe; cyncooper; ohioWfan

354 posted on 02/19/2003 4:07:28 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Get in line......we are 3 now, waiting for answers.

So I see.

I won't hold my breath waiting.

355 posted on 02/19/2003 4:08:41 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
My point exactly; I never said otherwise.

Bush may not always be right, he may sin or make mistakes.

It seems some cannot except that.
356 posted on 02/19/2003 4:11:00 PM PST by CyberCowboy777 (Extremism in the Pursuit of Liberty is no Vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat; Howlin; Jael
<< I'm conservative, the President is conservative, and I'm with the President. >>

Had Bill Clinton (or AlGore) appointed six known homosexuals to positions (and dumped the one on the AIDS panel who wasn't), would you have called him conservative? Had Bill Clinton raised spending on education, medicare, and the budget as a whole, would you have called him conservative? Had Bill Clinton supported closing the gun show "loophole", would you have called him conservative? Had Bill Clinton supported a man who had large holdings in an abortion provider for Speaker of the House, would you have considered him conservative? If Bill Clinton had relegated embryos as only having "POTENTIAL for life", would you have thought him a conservative? If Bill Clinton had tried to give Social Security to Mexicans, would you have called him conservative? If Clinton had the open-ended ability to declare war on who he wanted, when he wanted (with no determination of victory, or end), would you call that conservative?

But GWB does all these things, and much more, yet he is somehow still labeled a conservative. What is your definition of conservative?

<< BTW, is your opposition purely political, or do you actually support President Bush as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces? >>

I wonder why we're ignoring Saudi Arabi when all but a couple of the WTC bombers were Saudis? I wonder why we suddenly stopped demonizing Osama and started re-demonizing Saddam? I wonder why we agreed to let Syria (on our State Dep't list as a terrorist nation) on the UN Security Council just in time to help us fight this war on terror. In fact the UN SC looks like a list of "Terrorist R Us".

I'm for defending our nation, but I think this war on terrorism is more phony than professional wrestling.
357 posted on 02/19/2003 4:11:02 PM PST by Con X-Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
sorry if I took that out of context!
358 posted on 02/19/2003 4:11:39 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
This whole thread has no context.
359 posted on 02/19/2003 4:12:23 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
if you want to talk about the thread subject or want to ask Sabertooth what he meant be my guest

For those who can follow, my post #327 clearly is a cut and paste (I can do it, too!) of YOUR comment TO Sabertooth.

I was asking YOU about YOUR own statement that

"I think I will have to say this country is being sold out from within and from who is what really saddens me tonight.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/845727/posts?page=327#327

360 posted on 02/19/2003 4:13:52 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,361-1,369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson