[George W. Bush]

But then, the only reason that his contention is not 'proven' is that the fed gov and the AIDS establishment have closed ranks to prevent any statistical testing from happening (because it would end the fed gravy train) so it remains officially unproven, even though it is the only conclusion that fully fits all of the available information.

You may be right. I'm not saying he's wrong. Just that he doesn't have the irrefutable evidence. And we are talking about science here. Even if it's junk science with a lot of big money and sodomite politics involved in it you still have to prove in a way that can be duplicated independently.

I have followed Duesberg all along. Recall his early appearances explaining his theory on the old PBS Tony Brown's Journal? I think he appeared there 3 times for an hour each, somewhere around '87. He still lacks absolute proof. But his case is pretty strong compared to the rest of what passes for scientific inquiry into AIDS.

[editor-surveyor]

" He still lacks absolute proof..."

You keep saying this, but I suspect that you simply are not aware of the degree of proof that exists. Government sponsored studies are not the only way of proving something.

Have you ever read Christine Maggiore's book "What if everything you thought you knew about AIDS was wrong?" - The last 1/4 of the book consists of 36 pages of individual case testimonials that together are far beyond reasonable proof as such is defined in law. Only a complete moron would continue to believe that HIV has anything to do with AIDS after reading that information.