Replies

" He still lacks absolute proof..."

You keep saying this, but I suspect that you simply are not aware of the degree of proof that exists. Government sponsored studies are not the only way of proving something.

Have you ever read Christine Maggiore's book "What if everything you thought you knew about AIDS was wrong?" - The last 1/4 of the book consists of 36 pages of individual case testimonials that together are far beyond reasonable proof as such is defined in law. Only a complete moron would continue to believe that HIV has anything to do with AIDS after reading that information.

Have you ever read Christine Maggiore's book "What if everything you thought you knew about AIDS was wrong?"

I don't have the book but her work and personal history is very interesting.

Christine Maggiore - 2 short articles and and interview at VirusMyth.Net
AliveAndWell.org - her excellent website

Thanks for the mention. It's been a while since I went through some of these sites. If you put her ideas together with Duesberg, you can derive a certain picture. But I'm still not quite ready to dismiss AIDS/HIV altogether. But it's clear we don't know as much as we pretend to with AIDS. What I find most objectionable is that anyone like Duesberg is automatically excluded because he won't tow the party line. It's more like old-time Red front organizations, like American Communists in the Thirties and Forties, than it is like normal science. Certainly Duesberg, the man who discovered retroviruses, deserves serious consideration rather than to be dismissed by the entire AIDS industry merely because he casts some serious doubts upon that which sustains their revenue stream.