To: George W. Bush
But then, the only reason that his contention is not 'proven' is that the fed gov and the AIDS establishment have closed ranks to prevent any statistical testing from happening (because it would end the fed gravy train) so it remains officially unproven, even though it is the only conclusion that fully fits all of the available information.
294 posted on
01/29/2003 11:41:48 AM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
To: editor-surveyor
But then, the only reason that his contention is not 'proven' is that the fed gov and the AIDS establishment have closed ranks to prevent any statistical testing from happening (because it would end the fed gravy train) so it remains officially unproven, even though it is the only conclusion that fully fits all of the available information.
You may be right. I'm not saying he's wrong. Just that he doesn't have the irrefutable evidence. And we are talking about science here. Even if it's junk science with a lot of big money and sodomite politics involved in it you still have to prove in a way that can be duplicated independently.
I have followed Duesberg all along. Recall his early appearances explaining his theory on the old PBS Tony Brown's Journal? I think he appeared there 3 times for an hour each, somewhere around '87. He still lacks absolute proof. But his case is pretty strong compared to the rest of what passes for scientific inquiry into AIDS.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson