Naturalist sophistry apparently permeates not only the theory of evolution but also those who defend it. Afraid to call a spade a spade while drowning in the opposite opiate of self-delusion.
No need to waste it on this simple fool.
Not exactly a statement supportive of your position, but considering how fundamentally weak and factually inaccurate your position is, I hardly call that surprising.
You claim that the theory of evolution makes fundamental assumptions regarding the origin and purpose of life. I'm not familiar with that particular theory. You, on the other hand, are arguing against it with such vigor that you must be fully conversant with it. I asked you once to state that theory and you demurred. I asked you again and you called me names. Is it really that unreasonable a request? Or could it be that you are aware of your own dishonesty, and seek to change the subject?