Posted on 11/30/2002 8:03:21 AM PST by B4Ranch
If anyone would like to post a link to this thread on another thread and doesn't know how, just add a < at the BEGINNING of this URL and then post it. No spaces, just snuggle it right up to the 'a'
a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/798313/posts">Can you help America?
The link will appear as "Can you Help America?" in the thread you are on.
The flag is the symbol of our national unity, our national endeavor, our national aspiration.
My husband and I lived in Houston which was over-flowing with immigrants (and crime) and we ended up moving to rural Alaska where there are no immigrants, and I doubt any would want to come here because all benefits go to Alaska Natives (Eskimos). This is a very remote area without much infrastructure, which is part of the reason I like it here. Plus there is no crime and it's very beautiful.
I am thinking though our gov. is allowing all these people to flood in because they want them here. I'm not sure why all this is happening, especially in light of 9/11 and terrorist threats. It makes no sense to me at all. But the way I look at it, the America that we once knew is gone forever; this trend will not be reversed. I don't think anything can be done by us regular people though because I believe they want things to be this way, "they" being the Powers that Be.
Soon the takers will out-number the givers, and what will happen then?
LOL! We may have found at least some common ground!:-)
(1) Roll back the welfare state, including rules that hospital emergency rooms need not treat every type of illness -- some illegals bring their kids in with minor colds, because a doctor is too expensive, and emergency rooms are "free." But this won't happen, because it'd be deemed racist, and contrary to "compassionate conservatism."
(2) Roll back the welfare state in other areas, such as free education. Again, "racist" and contrary to Bush's "no child left behind" pledge.
(3) Volunteer to teach English as a second language & adult literary, so as to encourage assimilation.
I have a good friend who got married young, but she never had children and never worked because she didn't have to. Some people gave her a lot of grief over that. She spent a lot of her time on her house, cooking, and taking classes. I feel sorry though for the many women who are put down for not working when they have children. People need to understand that raising children is a very important and time-consuming job!
Many people seem to feel that illegal immigrants are vile scum who break our immigration laws expressly to rape our women, kill our men, and tax our welfare and health care systems. After hearing Michelle Malkin speak, I was struck by her obviously hysterical portrait of illegals, which is completely false for the overwhelming majority of them.
I like illegal immigrants. That's right, I do. They have the guts to flee the disasterous problems in their own country and seek new frontiers in the US. They take enormous risks to come here, walking through deserts, piling into flimsy vehicles, and going for long periods of time without food or water. All so they can work here and send their earnings down to their long-suffering families back in Mexico.
Yes, they are lawbreakers. So are most of us; do you not go 55 miles an hour in a 45 zone much of the time? Do you not arrange your tax return to pay as little tax as possible? Of course you do.
Furthermore, they are defying a faceless, incompetent bureaucracy. Is it any wonder that illegals pour into this country when legal entry is so difficult? Michelle Malkin, in her speech, commented that it was not fair for her to have to go through these bureaucratic hoops, while illegals can just hop on a bus and come back here. When farmers defy unfair laws, you criticise the laws, not the farmers. Could the same not be true here?
I am not saying illegals are perfect, but they do the jobs most of us don't want to do, and they work hard and do them well. From what I have seen, most of our native entry-level workers are apathetic, spoiled and rebellious; Mexicans come to do our work, and don't complain.
Now, Michelle Malkin has some valid points. Should we reform our visa system to control entry by terrorists more carefully? Sure we should. Should we amend our "catch and release" policy so people who've committed serious crimes are not dumped across the border, soon to return? Of course.
But should we write a book implying that illegals are evil criminals who should be ejected out of this country as soon as humanly possible? And we should spend billions and billions of dollars on efforts to close our borders? I think not.
Why not?
Because it looks a lot like a war against hispanics, even those who are in the country legally. Those here in California will not vote for a Republican for as long as this issue is prominent. What you're going to do is split the Republican party over this issue, and ensure the Democrats a permanent lock on the Statehouse.
More to the point, all of this hateful talk about illegals strikes me as UnAmerican, contrary to the principles we hold dear. Illegals are trying to better themselves, to find a better, fuller, more satisfying life.
Remember the sign on the Statue of Liberty:
Bring usThe hatred I hear in your voices for illegals will force everyone who is an immigrant, is the child of an immigrant, or is friends with an immigrant to vote against you. If fully expressed, as you folks seem to want, it will create 90-10 margins for the Democrats among Hispanic voters, and our party will be finished. Frankly, it appalls me that people I generally like and respect are listening seriously to this kind of talk.
your tired,
your poor,
your huddled masses
Yearning to break free ...
Before I close this up, I should respond to Michelle Malkin's point about Al Queda and immigration law. Is it true the Al Queda members could flood into this country from Mexico if our borders are not closed?
Yes, it is true.
But I feel we have better ways of catching them. Hit their money trail, for example. Or check anyone who has contact with suspected Al Queda cells and form a pattern. This investigation method has the massive advantage of only affecting the civil rights of potential Al Queda members, not all tourists. It will spot Al Queda members already here - and we have reason to believe most of their network is already in place. And it also has the advantage of being much, much cheaper. So don't consider the Al Queda connection a reason to majorly inconvenience everyone who ever enters this country from another nation.
I love Free Republic, because it symbolizes, well, a free republic. If we want to close our borders, we are going to make this more into a police state ... and in the end, this is not in the interests of anyone on this thread.
D
PS I am pinging some of my friends on Free Republic to respond to this message. Note that this does not indicate whether I believe they would support or oppose me on this topic, which I know is explosive around here.
My memories also. I can remember knowing how women were being suckered. Prices of everything would rise, because there would be more disposable income. Government & businesses keep track of such things, & they only let the little guy have just so much of his earnings.
And I worked in both big & small businesses & knew that most family budgets come to depend on two incomes & the woman is trapped unless the couple makes a big effort to save one of the incomes.
I hated NAFTA from the start, & go out of my way to speak out about it wherever I am - grocery & department stores, etc. On two occasions recently, I ordered some items from catalogs - one very expensive, knowing full well that I would probably send them back. Sure, I have to pay the postage & handling, but it feels good to write a comment on why I'm returning the merchandise.
Maybe they'll get the idea one of these days...Americans can do it better!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.