[facedown]

Bump

[RGSpincich]

It's the timing. If you want to question paternity, do it in the nine month grace period.

[Ditter]

Lied? Maybe the slut just didn't know.

[FITZ]

Maybe they should start giving child custody to the parent best able to provide and care for the child. It doesn't seem right that any type of woman can expect to get 1/4 to a 1/3 of someone's income for 20 years through fraud.

[BuddhaBoy]

As I keep saying to any man who would listen, that it is CRAZY for a man to marry and have children under our current legal conditions in America.

Once a man's name is on a marriage certificate and/or birth certificate, he will in one way or another end up an indentured servant at the point of a government gun.

Just say no, Men.

[IronJack]

The court opinion is a little meatier than this would lead you to believe. It would behoove folks to read the decision before forming an opinion. Not to say I in any way applaud this ruling; I consider it an abomination. But the court had its reasons for ruling as it did, and the opinion spells them out pretty clearly.

[I_Love_My_Husband]

Women who do this are disgraceful.

But, okay guys, why are you marrying this type of girl? There are a LOT of single women out there, most of them would not act this way.

Find a good girl who is straight edge, doesn't do drugs, drink , smoke and is faithful.

It's not that hard to do.

[MissAmericanPie]

I think the man should be able to sue for fraud, personal injury, and to get his funds back in this kind of situation.

American justice should go even farther than that, when a woman falsely accuses a man of rape, she should be given the prison time that he would have had to endure.

A person doesn't have to be personally involved to be sick of the double standard handed to men. I have a son coming up and I want to know that he can count on the American justice system to extend him the justice that is his due as an American should he need it.

[tallhappy]

What a creep this guy is. Nice way to treat your kid.

And stupid as a block of wood to boot.

[advocate10]

IMHO, a man ought to be able to sue a woman for dang near anything! She's there, ain't she? ~8^[

[AlaskaErik]

Robert Day had already been divorced from his wife for six years when he realized he was out of town when she conceived.

It took him six years (or longer) to figure out he was out of town and this wasn't his kid?!!! 'Nuff said.

[shiva]

Have any of you read this little piece of info?

http://webmd.lycos.com/content/article/1728.56699

Men Liberation!! Men will soon be burning their jock straps.

[Publius6961]

Why men should be able to sue women who lie about who's the daddy

You mean they can't?

If not, that is a perfect illustration of the distinction between a "moral" law and a "Legal" one.
We've collectively been run over by lots of immoral laws and people are getting really pissed!

[winodog]

All the people who are saying this is right need to walk in a mans shoes who is in this situation.
Many times the woman leaves the man, divorce or if not married,just ups and leaves, maybe moving in with another man.
Or if married fills for divorce and then has the other man move in. This alone is devastating to the man. He has (in some situations) woke up one day to find the only woman he has ever loved has left him and his children have been taken away.
He gets every other weekend to see his kids.He is probaly in lots of trouble, for the first time in his life,moneywise.
He might have to get a studio apartment and has no money to do anything with his kids and his kids quickly tire of not being able to be with their close friends on the weekend.
Mom starts playing games with his visitation rights as well.
A few years later he is picking up his son and the new daddy meets him at the door, gives his "son a kiss and hug goodbye and old dad looks and goes holy shit, they look just alike!
So now you have a devestated father who has lost the woman he loves, his child or children are slowly being taken out of his life and he realizes the son or daughter isnt even his.
What if he wasnt married, didnt really have any rights and mom and new dad say little johnny is not your son and since he is just two or three years old we think it is a good idea for you to stay away.
So should old dad keep fighting for little visitation he has or should he put the child in Gods hands and walk away.
Remember he is already devastated, may have turned to drinking as the only fix that helps him.
Should a man keep fighting for the little visitation he has, keep paying 1/3 to 1/4 or more of his money?
They are too many scenarios for a man not to be able to withdraw and stop paying for a child that is not his.
It is wrong for man to be forced to pay for a child that is not his.
This is a new age and we have to be able to adapt.
This is probaly one of the reasons muslims have the strict laws they have about a womans infidelity ( I am not saying it is right) just that they realize how important it is "for the children" not to have to question who their real dad is.
A woman does not have to worry about this.
Maybe the solution is to have all childrens DNA tested at birth.
This might help for medical reasons as well.after all the bottom line is this is for the children so since men and women cant stop sleeping around this is a solution that will avoid many problems in the future.

[F-117A]

Sounds like the "wife" might be engaged in a conspiracy to defraud. The "ex-husband" should have recourse against the "boyfriend". Also, let the "boyfriend" should be made to start picking up the tab from here on out.

Perhaps if a few of the honey dippers are burned for support it might make them stop coveting the neighbor's wife.

[ColdSteelTalon]

If the child does not belong to the father then the man has no responsibility period. This is one of the reasons why I advocate the death penalty for adultery. If you want to screw around then get a divorce first.

[Vicki]

Women who do this are, in my opinion, criminals. If found out, they should be prosecuted and put in jail. If a woman doesn't know who the father is, she should say she doesn't know instead of trying to save her "reputation" and ruin some guy's life.

[Savage Beast]

Look, these cases are neither difficult nor different. The law should force the woman to name the child's father; he and she should be forced to return all money spent on account of their fraud to the fraud victim; they are responsible for the support of their child. The fraud victim should be legally absolved of all financial obligations concerning their child. Period. It's quite simple.